AMD: R7xx Speculation

Status
Not open for further replies.
RV670 : 320 Alu / 5D = 64 SP / 4 blocs = 16 TMUs + 16 ROPs (4 blocs x 4)
RV770 : 800 Alu / 5D = 160 SP / 5 blocs = 32 TMUs + 20 ROPs (5 blocs x 4)

Seems plausible ?
 
That's still $70 more than the mooted 4850 price point, for a card that's supposedly 10% slower. And that's probably from dodgy venders, we should use newegg for pices generally.

And I agree G92b prices will fall, the question is what it's going to do to Nvidias profit margins, especially since it supposedly was struggling margins on G92b even at current prices.

Dodgy vendors, are you kidding me? You can get 9800 GTX from buy.com, tiger direct, and compusa.com all for that price, and it's going to become even more competitively priced once the new Radeon's come out.

From rumors so far, the 4850 is about equal performance to the 9800 GTX.

The 4850 is going to be introduced at the $200 price point? I doubt that. And if so, profit margins will be relatively slim. Remember that NVIDIA has been milking relatively high margins on the 9800GTX for a while now, as that card had been commading $300-400 in the beginning.
 
RV670 : 320 Alu / 5D = 64 SP / 4 blocs = 16 TMUs + 16 ROPs (4 blocs x 4)
RV770 : 800 Alu / 5D = 160 SP / 5 blocs = 32 TMUs + 20 ROPs (5 blocs x 4)
I've been wondering about 5 quad RBEs because the colour fillrate was a bit higher than expected - but until more slides appear I think we're stuck.

Jawed
 
1. Now we know that the RV770 is capable of "ONE TERA" and more... ( proof )
2. We know that the HD 4850 is clocked at 625 MHz... we know it right ?
3. We know that the AA + AF works great -> more than 16 TMUs.

So it can be: 625 MHz x [800 Alu / 5D = 160 SP / 10 blocs of 4 TUs = 40 TMUs] = 1 TFLOPs.
 
Code:
Registry Whois Domain Name: radeon-graphics.net 

Status: ok 

Registrar: CRONON AG BERLIN, NIEDERLASSUNG REGENSBURG 
Whois Server: whois.tmagnic.net 
Referral URL: http://nsi-robo.tmag.de 

Expiration Date: 2009-02-04 
Creation Date: 2007-02-04 
Last Update Date: 2008-02-05 

Name Servers: 
    ns.stratoserver.net 
    ns2.stratoserver.net 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Extended Info  IP Address: 85.214.24.213
IP Location:  Germany
Website Status: active
Server Type: Apache/2.0.48 (Linux/SuSE)
Cache Date: 2008-06-12 10:15:42 MST
 
It's not, so your claims hold no value.

The only "claim" was that it could be found as low as ~ $235 (albeit with rebate), and maybe $34 more without rebate. Now that offer is no good, but surely it is a sign of things to come once the 4850 is released. Also interesting to note is that 8800 GT in SLI can be had for about $240. Of course, there are always some issues with SLI/Crossfire too, but judging from your sig, that's not a big deal to you :)
 
jimmyjames123 said:
The only "claim" was that it could be found as low as ~ $235 (albeit with rebate), and maybe $34 more without rebate. Now that offer is no good

And that claim was proven false:

I see the linked one supposedly for 234 but I follow the link and they want 294 after rebate.

jimmyjames123 said:
but judging from your sig, that's not a big deal to you

Actually I just sold that piece of shit.
 
Rebates end, that's just a fact of life. The $235 after rebate price was for a limited time of course. Anyway, in arguing semantics, you are truly missing the point. The point is that comparing 4870 to 9800 GTX, and 4850 to 8800 GT, is ultimately fruitless because they will not be at the same prices, unless you claim that the 4870 will be introduced at just north of $250, and that the 4850 will be introduced at $125 :D It's just as silly as comparing a $600 GTX 280 to a $300 3870X2.
 
Rebates end, that's just a fact of life.

It was 294 after (not before) rebates. The link on nvnews was just mislabeled (it happens all the time on google shopping).


The point is that comparing 4870 to 9800 GTX, and 4850 to 8800 GT, is ultimately fruitless because they will not be at the same prices

The 4870 could very well be $300 (vs $270 for the 9800 GTX). While they are not the same price, they are close enough. If the 4870 is higher in price then that obviously changes things. As for the 4850 (~$200) vs 8800GT (~$150) comparison, it's not exactly AMD's fault that Nvidia doesn't currently have a card at the ~$200 price range (and the 4850 should preform well enough over the 8800 GT to justify the $50 premium).
 
1. Now we know that the RV770 is capable of "ONE TERA" and more... ( proof )
2. We know that the HD 4850 is clocked at 625 MHz... we know it right ?
3. We know that the AA + AF works great -> more than 16 TMUs.

So it can be: 625 MHz x [800 Alu / 5D = 160 SP / 10 blocs of 4 TUs = 40 TMUs] = 1 TFLOPs.

We are just waiting on a Vantage score with the texture score for a 4870, that or a non-buggy GPU-Z shot.
I am leaning towards 32TMUs though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top