Amazon or Google or any of the biggest MS competitors buying the Xbox brand is, needless to say, premature to even think about.
It's laughable anyway. None of those companies would really want the Xbox hardware nor should they.
If Xbox is going away it'll just go away, nobody is going to buy it. Perhaps the studios could be sold off piecemeal but even that is unlikely imo. Amazon is certainly not going to want expensive 150+ person studios for it's little Fire TV thing (isn't that thing already kind of a failure anyway?). Google's not much into hardware.
MS financial filing for their last fiscal year [ended on June 30]:
- "Xbox Platform revenue increased $1.7 billion or 34%, due mainly to sales of Xbox One"
- "Xbox Platform cost of revenue increased $2.1 billion or 72%, due mainly to higher volumes of consoles sold and higher costs associated with Xbox On"
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=124461899&postcount=1
So, $400 million lost on gross margin, that's without additional operating costs. Simply put, Xbone consoles are sold at significant loss for now.
First, your conclusion doesn't follow. We dont have enough information to reach your conclusion. The difference between revenue increase and cost of revenue increase does not mean it lost $400 million, you obviously cant just subtract the two figures and get net profit, I'm sure you're sophisticated enough to know that. Even the wording actually excludes that they are talking about Xbox One hardware (higher costs associated with Xbox One!=just hardware), even if you could just subtract the two.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertc...he-xbox-one-will-break-even-or-make-a-profit/
September 5 2013
Many have wondered if Microsoft will have yet another change of heart and cut the price of the console ahead of launch, but new information says that’s probably unlikely. Xbox chief marketing officer Yusuf Mehdi spoke to GamesIndustry about the margins they’ll be making on the Xbox One at launch, and there’s little room for error.
“We’re looking to break even or low margin at worst,” he said. “As we can cost-reduce our box as we’ve done with 360, we’ll continue to price reduce and get even more competitive with our offering. You’ve seen us over the years constantly be focused on profitability and improving year over year. If you look at 360 that platform lasted for seven to eight years and it’s going to go for another three years. It’s incredibly profitable now in the tail.”
Basically Mehdi said in September they were aiming for break even or low profit on X1 hardware. Now unless you think removing Kinect and lopping off $100 made some major change to this paradigm (doubtful).
Has the Xbox brand lost money every year? I thought 360 was profitable in the end?
I stopped trying to keep up as much a couple years ago, but yes 360 likely was profitable as a whole project. I have some figures through 2011 that show a great increase in profit, and then the last years should be covered by Mehdi's statement. So yes, even after RROD 360 likely netted a billion or two profit. It lost a lot in the beginning, then made a lot at the end.
13% of Top Four revenue. 15% of the revenue of Office+OS+server. 10% of total revenue. That's certainly a notable piece of pie, although surely profitability is more important? What are the financials for each department's contribution to profit?
There must be some question about the worth of XBox, otherwise these calls for selling it wouldn't have started. Unless there are some really stupid investors out there who looked at the XBox division making nice profits and said they wanted it axed, there must be a decent financial argument for its removal. I suppose the argument could be that where the division is profitable, it'll drop in profitability going forwards but presently would command a decent price in a sale, so better to sell it while it's hot then when it's nearly defunct (if that's the prediction).
What investors are actually calling for this? Mostly I just see people on message boards doing it. An occasional armchair financial analyst at a Forbes blog or something is about the extent of it.
I just saw a blurb the MS has lost $1.7 billion on trying to make Surface a success. Xbox is probably the least of their problems, and I think it's probably about break even right now.
I think it's still pretty arguable why anybody except perhaps Nintendo (including Sony) is in the core gaming business. IMO it's pretty self contained and will never be hugely profitable (I recall Sony didn't net that much profit from PS2, obviously as successful as you could hope a console to be). Although, we know the old loss leading console model at least is over and these new mid range AMD boxes should be break even at first rather than big money losers like a PS2, PS3, or 360.
Can someone explain "cost of revenue" what sort of english is that ?
Financial English
Seems pretty self explanatory to me. You get X revenue and it costs you Y to get that revenue. Y is cost of revenue. Basically just costs in a business, minus loan interest and tricky stuff like that.