Anyone else see this?....
When they are saying final stages before approval, do they mean approval to go gold? With the game being due March 22, doesn't it seem a bit early to apply for gold when they could have another few weeks left to tweak or polish?
Oh I have no problem saying the same in regards to C2. :smile:
My wording was off, I personally have issue claiming any game has the best in a category such as "best graphics", "best gameplay", or especially "best game EVAR!!" One of the best, I'm fine with though.
If an effect can be proven to be the best by a technical measure, then I have no issue with this, even if the tech can still produce ugly results =p
But is it running 100% real time, or is some of it pre-computed?
Actually it's not tough to call out how their opinion is incorrect.
What's worse is you can label it as an "opinion" when people should be showing/telling factual information about games or tech.
Edit: Beaten by L. Scofield lol
http://www.rediscussed.com/2011/01/31/interview-with-crysis-2-devs/Whats Changed Since the Crysis 2 Demo?
Crytek RobJ explained they were in the very, very last processes of debugging Crysis 2, only had a few more days before their own deadline. “The demo was compiled a while ago and a lot of things have been changed, and lots of bugs have been fixed” he added. As they were in the final stages before the game was completed to go for approval, he was to attend work on the Sunday later that day (so thanks for staying up).
I asked what else had changed since the demo compared to the game current play at work, he answered “Well the first thing I noticed it looks a bit different, we have a new strength texture/effect and also a new cloak effect. Another change that you’ll see is that they have improved the kill cam on the current version of Crysis 2.
When they are saying final stages before approval, do they mean approval to go gold? With the game being due March 22, doesn't it seem a bit early to apply for gold when they could have another few weeks left to tweak or polish?
Exactly. Though I'd argue that in the lighting departament C2 is indeed the best by far
Oh I have no problem saying the same in regards to C2. :smile:
My wording was off, I personally have issue claiming any game has the best in a category such as "best graphics", "best gameplay", or especially "best game EVAR!!" One of the best, I'm fine with though.
If an effect can be proven to be the best by a technical measure, then I have no issue with this, even if the tech can still produce ugly results =p
I argue that the lighting in C2 is tied with MLB: The Show. It could be argued that the lighting in MLB: The Show is better because it does it at twice the framerate.
But is it running 100% real time, or is some of it pre-computed?
Then, talk about what was incorrect about their opinion. Of course, that's a tough road to travel.
Actually it's not tough to call out how their opinion is incorrect.
What's worse is you can label it as an "opinion" when people should be showing/telling factual information about games or tech.
Edit: Beaten by L. Scofield lol