I predict 4 page breakdown:smile:Looks good. Really can't wait for DF analysys
I predict 4 page breakdown:smile:Looks good. Really can't wait for DF analysys
I predict 4 page breakdown:smile:
Whats interesting is that only the 360 IGN review proclaims such greatness, but fails to mention problems like they mention in the PS3 review. Clearly both have their faults, to mention one and not the other is a wee bit amateurish. Gamespot at least goes into detail about the iffy side of the visuals.
Ah, Arthur Gies...makes sense now. 8)
"It’s not leaps and bounds ahead of other graphical heavyweights, but it’s probably just a bit more polished"
Funny stuff from Games Rader. Polished?! It may dazzle, but polished it aint.
You can't really fight realism with any other art style.
It seems like Playstation Universe review stirred up the internet.
"The fact it is the best looking shooter on PlayStation 3"
just played the opening sequence on my 360....WOW, internet videos or screens don't even do this game justice.
stunning
What?!
Not exactly polished running sub hd, inconsitent framerate, bad LOD pop-in. I said it before and i'll say it again, Crytek should of aimed for 30fps 720P solid instead of throwing the kitchen sink at it.
After playing the campaign for the last 3+ hours, I can tell you it's not nearly bad as you make it sound here. Yes a random pop in, jaggy edge, sudden animation hiccup, or slight dip in frame rate will rear it's ugly head every once in a while but any small issue you may see is easily overshadowed by what they accomplished on consoles.
I'm never one to place any single game on a pedestal, but crysis is one of the best looking shooters out there IMO.
I for one have no problem agreeing that its one of the best looking game out there, cause stating otherwise would be straight out lying.
However, I do beg to differ if I am being told that it is the best looking, simply cause it is doing all that in real time while the other games pre-bake some elements.
I generally try to judge the visuals on basis of the end result instead of looking at what's going on beneath the hood.
I for one have no problem agreeing that its one of the best looking game out there, cause stating otherwise would be straight out lying.
However, I do beg to differ if I am being told that it is the best looking, simply cause it is doing all that in real time while the other games pre-bake some elements.
I generally try to judge the visuals on basis of the end result instead of looking at what's going on beneath the hood.