67% larger GPU for 30% better performance. They wanted to burn money for some reason.
How far can a Zen 2 CPU go though? Oliver mentions that he doesn’t know if it’s CPU-bound.
Above 60fps it's will likely start to be CPU limited in some extend. We have seen in purely GPU limited scenes (with framerate well under 60fps like in Elden Ring / Monster Hunter Wild quality modes) the boost is more around 35-40%. Which is expected because of a bit more of 60% (not 67%) more TFLOPs.
In my experience the quality of DLSS depends on the version of the DLSS *.dll files.DLSS can't take care about basic TAA-like ghosting? Very surprising.
Above 60fps it's will likely start to be CPU limited in some extend. We have seen in purely GPU limited scenes (with framerate well under 60fps like in Elden Ring / Monster Hunter Wild quality modes) the boost is more around 35-40%. Which is expected because of a bit more of 60% (not 67%) more TFLOPs.
PSSR looks so good in motion. This is the first thing I noticed months ago. Compared to FSR it's 2 gen ahead. And actually narrowly beats DLSS in that area.
Here PSSR vs FSR by the same guy
PSSR vs DLSS in motion
DLSS can't take care about basic TAA-like ghosting? Very surprising.
Above 60fps it's will likely start to be CPU limited in some extend. We have seen in purely GPU limited scenes (with framerate well under 60fps like in Elden Ring / Monster Hunter Wild quality modes) the boost is more around 35-40%. Which is expected because of a bit more of 60% (not 67%) more TFLOPs.
PSSR looks so good in motion. This is the first thing I noticed months ago. Compared to FSR it's 2 gen ahead. And actually narrowly beats DLSS in that area.
Here PSSR vs FSR by the same guy
PSSR vs DLSS in motion
Will they do a dedicated video for Callisto Protocol's Pro patch? It's worth a look in my opinion.
So PSSR is no longer just "disappointing." It's just down right bad. Imagine developing an AI upscaler only for it to be trading blows with FSR 2.
Older dll of DLSS - the Version that has the sit still and Ghost BugDLSS can't take care about basic TAA-like ghosting? Very surprising.
Above 60fps it's will likely start to be CPU limited in some extend. We have seen in purely GPU limited scenes (with framerate well under 60fps like in Elden Ring / Monster Hunter Wild quality modes) the boost is more around 35-40%. Which is expected because of a bit more of 60% (not 67%) more TFLOPs.
PSSR looks so good in motion. This is the first thing I noticed months ago. Compared to FSR it's 2 gen ahead. And actually narrowly beats DLSS in that area.
Here PSSR vs FSR by the same guy
PSSR vs DLSS in motion
It is a shame that one still has to go and manually update the .dll's, because the versions do differ a LOT in image quality presented.
What is really suprising is how variable PSSR is, in some titles looks ok in some just terrible. I am wondering if people will even care to implement it in multiplatform titles. It is limited to just one platform and results are okish. Not sure if its worth the effort, unless is sony exclusive etc. Dissapointing tbh.
Those are the only alternatives, though. Also, in console history, they used to be the premium place to play games. The dedicated solutions they came up with enabled things like smooth scrolling and multiple layers of parallax that weren't widely available on computers. Why shouldn't we be comparing new upscaling solutions like PSSR against other modern upscaling solutions. A dedicated gaming device should offer a compelling reason to own it, in features, price, or performance.
I don't expect studios to forever update their games (especially offline solo ones)
Just wondering, since they are .dll files, why they are not part of the driver.
I think the idea is that you ship a game with a tuned version of DLSS for the type of game you are making. So a game that, say, has an art style and camera movement where ghosting isn't an issue might ship with a version of DLSS that creats a clean image while that same .DLL would make a fast moving game be a ghost fest.
