GPU Ray Tracing Performance Comparisons [2021-2022]
- Thread starter DavidGraham
- Start date
3080 is 30% faster with Raytracing "normal": https://www.computerbase.de/2021-05...mm-metro-exodus-pc-enhanced-edition-3840-2160
Would be much faster with "ultra".
DavidGraham
Veteran
The 3080 is 20% faster @1440p Normal RT, it jumps to 28% faster with @1440p Ultra. @4K This would translate to the 3080 being 40% faster than 6800XT.
The 3090 is already 40% faster than 6900XT using 4K Normal RT. Using Ultra would mean the 3090 is at least 50% faster than 6900XT.
https://www.computerbase.de/2021-05/metro-exodus-pc-enhanced-edition-raytracing-benchmark-test/2/
I doubt that these results are limited by RT performance on NV h/w here. If that would be the case you'd see something similar to the results in Q2RTX or Minecraft.tough its under 60fps on rtx3070 in 4k so its not that geforces are bored with this game
The game also seem to not care that the majority of DXR h/w available on the market currently has only 6-8 GBs of VRAM. Another sign of new consoles being the sole h/w target.
Its not rocket science, just watch and see what the game is about regarding ray tracing (it technically is).
DavidGraham
Veteran
Metro Exodus Enchanced Edition test, @4K Ultra RT, 3090 is 50% faster than 6900XT, without DLSS2.
@2K Ultra RT the difference is 28%.
https://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/metro-exodus-enhanced-edition-test-gpu-cpu
@2K Ultra RT the difference is 28%.
https://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/metro-exodus-enhanced-edition-test-gpu-cpu
PCGH published their benchmarks with the "Ultra" preset and "Ultra" Raytracing:
https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Metr...us-Enhanced-Edition-Test-Vergleich-1371524/3/
In 4K the 3090 is 51% faster than the 6900 and the 3080 is 37% faster than the 6800XT.
The difference is smaller in lower resolutions.
https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Metr...us-Enhanced-Edition-Test-Vergleich-1371524/3/
In 4K the 3090 is 51% faster than the 6900 and the 3080 is 37% faster than the 6800XT.
The difference is smaller in lower resolutions.
Subtlesnake
Regular
The 6800 XT being faster on average than the 2080 Ti/3070 is a decent result, considering the trend from Control/Cyberpunk.
Panino Manino
Newcomer
I know this have have zero FidelityFX, but what about GameWorks?
Bondrewd
Veteran
Has Hairworks and then some.
Panino Manino
Newcomer
But with AMD "hybrid solution", having "gameworks magic" occupying the shaders matters for RT.
I played the Resident Evil 8 demo and in the Village part the RTGI is the worst implementation i have seen in games. It is on par with Control's GI. Wow, it is so slow and visual so distracting that i dont understand why there arent more options on the PC. Going from Screen Space to ultra slow RT isnt really better...
Are you sure it's the RTGI and not simply the effect of "eyesight adjustment" going from light to dark areas.. which the game does all the time?
Can't remember anything being wrong with Control GI tbh
In Control the diffuse GI was to slow and created a very annoying ghosting effect.
Someone did a gif for another problem but the slow RTGI is so obvious: https://www.resetera.com/threads/resident-evil-village-pc-performance-thread.421793/post-64594967
Someone did a gif for another problem but the slow RTGI is so obvious: https://www.resetera.com/threads/resident-evil-village-pc-performance-thread.421793/post-64594967
How do you mean it? (Can't see gif at full res)
Slow because low FPS or slow because lighting / shadows lag behind? Scene is static, so guess it's the former. But why sure GI is the cause?
An example from the demo: https://imgsli.com/NTM2Mjk
It needs seconds to get stable reconstructed. Everytime something moves the RTGI gets destroyed and must be rebuild.
It needs seconds to get stable reconstructed. Everytime something moves the RTGI gets destroyed and must be rebuild.
