I've rechecked some of my prior 'knowledge' on prices and see that you're righ; Sony have been charging a higher premium for Europe than local market warrants in some cases, and very signifcantly at times.
Thanks for taking the time to look into it. I waited to reply until Sony released the UK price for the Vita. Today it was announced to be £229.
So taking todays exchange rate (yes, I know it changes) and assuming EU and UK Sales Tax rates of 20%, you have the following:
US $249
EU €249 = $286.21
UK £229 = $301.01
$52 premium for UK gamers?
However, that's not one black mark against Sony
For me it is. Sorry.
and a clean sheet for MS because Sony do actually release their products in Europe, whereas MS sometimes don't. Even if PSP launched a year late in Europe, at least it launched unlike Zune.
A few years back I was looking at DLP's and there were some 70" Sony's that looked great and were competitevly priced. Of course, they weren't released in the UK, not going any higher than 50".
Which, I propose, is as valid an argument as to berate MS for not releasing a MP3 player in europe in a game console related thread and forum.
etc...I don't think either deserves credit for supporting Europe fairly.
I don't disagree with everything you said, and both companies have their failings in Europe. My only contention is that the "new kid on the block" is doing better in most regards (price, release dates, software support) than the company who has been at it much longer.
And, to bring it back to the actual topic of the thread, they could and should have done even better and focusing less on the Japanese market and reallocating those resources to the EMEA region could have benefitted both those consumers and also MS in that region.
Let's hope that, next gen, they don't make the same mistake again. And even more forlorn hope is that Sony start to treat the EU market more fairly (at least as fairly as MS would be a good start). Though the Vita pricing suggests it's not a priority.