Decoding with cpu is super heavy. With how slow xbox cpu is, they probably use gpu.
Xbox One Slim
- Thread starter dobwal
- Start date
And yet libavcodec is said to be faster than current OpenCL and CUDA decoders (obviously assuming no quality loss, some OpenCL/CUDA decoders sacrifice quality for speed)
I'm not sure why people seem hellbent on it being identical with Xbox One SoC, when there's clear signs it's not.
hmm, im still using LAV codec and it took around 20% of my CPU with "none" acceleration. and only 5-10% with "DXVA2 Native". Have not tried libavcodec with ffmpeg due to im too afraid of borking the whole codec settings (currently everything, including old and trusty WMP can use LAV and can read OGG files).
the weird thing is, when im using LAV with Intel Quick Sync. It have the same CPU usage as "none" :/
For decoding high bitrate HEVC (H.265)? Which CPU are you using?
edit: for claritys sake, the HEVCBenchmark uses videos filling HEVC Main 10, Level 5, Main Tier specs
edit2:
version 1.61: https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=8329B08E8413A80E!478&authkey=!AN817fyIH7zpru4&ithint=file,zip
UHD Bluray plugin: https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=8329B08E8413A80E!474&authkey=!AGV83F55agAjLTg&ithint=file,zip
Last edited:
I've seen forum and youtubers scream I have an xbox one, now i must buy the s, and a year later the scorpio! Is microsoft mad? How they tink that I can pay all that?
I often ask myself if internet is a magnifying glass for all the idiots in the world, or it just reveal the nature of the people
I often ask myself if internet is a magnifying glass for all the idiots in the world, or it just reveal the nature of the people
Silent_Buddha
Legend
Are you testing with internet encoded HEVC 4K content (low bitrate) or UHD BluRay HEVC 4K content (high bitrate)?
Regards,
SB
It's streaming hevc.
Just tried 4k 250mbps hevc and it freeze my pc. It even take a few seconds for alt f4 to register
Just tried 4k 250mbps hevc and it freeze my pc. It even take a few seconds for alt f4 to register
Yeah, those streaming files aren't really a valid comparison point for 4K BluRay content, which use high bitrates (though I don't think they quite use 250 Mbps
It's really that high?
One could argue VP9 is better, other that H.265 is better, they're in similar ballpark anyway.
Silent_Buddha
Legend
s=
That's technically true. But the reality is that the vast majority of people either can't tell the difference between a 128 bit encoded MP3 and a 256 bit encoded MP3 or struggle to identify which is which. And when it comes to 256 bit encoding or 320 bit encoding, it's very rare to find a person that can tell the difference between that and the uncompressed source even on the best hardware that money can buy.
I love having recordings in FLAC, but it's basically just a placebo for me and anyone I've invited over. If I randomly mix in 320 bit MP3s in an album, there hasn't been a single person that has been able to distinguish which is the FLAC and which is the 320 bit MP3. Back in the mid 2000's I did the same test with uncompressed WAVs and 320 bit MP3s with the same results.
Regards,
SB
That's technically true. But the reality is that the vast majority of people either can't tell the difference between a 128 bit encoded MP3 and a 256 bit encoded MP3 or struggle to identify which is which. And when it comes to 256 bit encoding or 320 bit encoding, it's very rare to find a person that can tell the difference between that and the uncompressed source even on the best hardware that money can buy.
I love having recordings in FLAC, but it's basically just a placebo for me and anyone I've invited over. If I randomly mix in 320 bit MP3s in an album, there hasn't been a single person that has been able to distinguish which is the FLAC and which is the 320 bit MP3. Back in the mid 2000's I did the same test with uncompressed WAVs and 320 bit MP3s with the same results.
Regards,
SB
Yeah. Those big files doesn't gave substantial difference with much smaller files.
But some people swears by it.
I guess my eyes and ears is too Nirmal
Luckily this means I can enjoy stuff without hassle (can stream, etc).
Heck, I often steam via Bluetooth 2.0 to my home theater. It's an old one, with no AptX support.
But some people swears by it.
I guess my eyes and ears is too Nirmal
Luckily this means I can enjoy stuff without hassle (can stream, etc).
Heck, I often steam via Bluetooth 2.0 to my home theater. It's an old one, with no AptX support.
Intel has a new compute stick featuring the core m3
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10447/the-intel-compute-stick-core-m36y30-review/6
15w under load
I still believe this will be the final form of the xbox one. It may take until 7nm however.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10447/the-intel-compute-stick-core-m36y30-review/6
15w under load
I still believe this will be the final form of the xbox one. It may take until 7nm however.
D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
Just to be clear, you're saying you think Microsoft will shrink to XBox One to this size???
Just to be clear, you're saying you think Microsoft will shrink to XBox One to this size???
That's a lot of optimism to fit in a very small enclosure ...
Similar threads
