Joe DeFuria said:
No, the only way to get 100% support of the HDD is if it were non removable, like the xbox1.
Actually, because of the importance of cross platform development, the only way I could see significant support would be if MS
and Sony had the HDD
standard.
I am still for the HDD, but since they were not requiring games to check for it and content caching seemed to be on the way out + the free WinXP streaming and the like for demos, microtransactions, trailers, etc + No TiVo features, I think MS pretty much saw it uneccesary--but only because they did so.
The possibilities one has with a HDD--for content caching, free demos, trailers, game expansion packs, user created content, TiVo, Audio Storage, etc--are HUGE HUGE HUGE.
But it seems MS dislikes it due to 1. cost 2. PS3 is not supporting HDD standard 3. do not want to hurt WMC sales, etc...
i.e. the same junk that KILLED Sony in the MP3 market
A better strategy for MS, IMO, is to
require the HDD for Xbox Live GOLD. This means EVERYONE playing games ONLINE will have the HDD feature.
Online gaming already fragments the userbase. Doing so further like:
Xbox
Xbox + Live
Xbox + HDD
Xbox HDD + Live
Is stupid. HOPEFULLY, Live GOLD requires a HDD. Heck, package the external HDD with a year of Live GOLD. Just don't sell GOLD w/o a HDD!
That would be the only saving grace IMO because you would have
Xbox
Xbox + LIVE/HDD
That I could live with