radar1200gs said:To the best of my knowledge, neither Id, nor Activision have ever officially announced any Doom3 release date.
Oh stop your nitpicking... lied too...pifft. Worry? about a game. You know who lied to the public . Comming in 2003 was the date......sept 30 was a date, sept,2002, nov2002,Xmass 2002, end of the year, out in mass by april,May, July, oh yeah the nv35 was in mass by august2003, Dates lies. 3Dc is "not good" ,"sm3.0 matters now" Nvidia has the best drivers, ... ill stop now on the list of lies. mehDemoCoder said:There is a difference between not announcing a release date and being "delayed" and specifically not only announcing a date, but reinforcing it several times.
I want D3 as well, but iD never gave me a date to worry about, so for me it's "until it's done". At the very least, they never lied to the public.
That happens all the time, and those sorts of "promises" slip all the time too.Tim said:radar1200gs said:To the best of my knowledge, neither Id, nor Activision have ever officially announced any Doom3 release date.
They promissed that it would be released in 2003 on huge banners at E3 2002.
And they claimed that they would only present the at one E3 (the one in 2002).
your such a puff. i feel like they lied to me. But they had to do the music over,, Who cares. this is SO off topic.radar1200gs said:That happens all the time, and those sorts of "promises" slip all the time too.Tim said:radar1200gs said:To the best of my knowledge, neither Id, nor Activision have ever officially announced any Doom3 release date.
They promissed that it would be released in 2003 on huge banners at E3 2002.
And they claimed that they would only present the at one E3 (the one in 2002).
Show me an actual official release date - dd, month, year, and it has to be from Activision or Id.
Well, given the repeated delays for HL2, I would hope Gabe would be spending his time coding and not playing games. For his companie's sake, and those people clutching vouchers, I hope this is trueAlphaWolf said:Note: Gabe Newell also plays games, he doesn't just code them. I expect he has a very good idea of dx9 performance in general, but I frankly don't recall a comment of his directly regarding X800.
Payola is probably a bit strong, but certainly both Nvidia and ATI have marketing deals with developers that can be seen to compromise their integrity. I believe in mose cases these deals are restricted to marketing and technical help, rather than anything more underhand. Whilst I find it annoying to see hardware manufacturers' logos plastered over game boxes and intro screens, I can accept that the technical help offered by card companies often does help improve the game for the consumer (and for all compliant hardware, not just the sponsorer hardware manufacturer).<edit> 'Payola' does roll off the tongue much better than 'The Way It's Meant to be Played' or 'Get in the Game' doesn't it?
Geeforcer said:Looking at some other scores in Xbit article, it seems that Nvidia drivers could use quite a bit of work.
radar1200gs said:That happens all the time, and those sorts of "promises" slip all the time too.
Show me an actual official release date - dd, month, year, and it has to be from Activision or Id.
AlphaWolf said:Note: Gabe Newell also plays games, he doesn't just code them. I expect he has a very good idea of dx9 performance in general, but I frankly don't recall a comment of his directly regarding X800.
"In terms of performance, it's pretty fast," said Gabe Newell, president of Valve Software, the developer of Half-Life II. "When I say 'pretty fast' I mean that its 40 percent faster in internal testing, faster than any next-generation parts that are coming out. That's a huge advantage in developing a game."
Yes, but mostly enthusiasts bought the cards, and most of you admit to upgrading regularly. By the time you actually receive the game, chances are you will no longer own the card it was to be bundled with! I wouldn't mind betting you won't get a cd either, you'll probably have to make do with a copy downloaded from Steam.
DemoCoder said:Althornin said:The general tone of your posts is quite clear.
Boost a certain IHv, and slyly jab at a different one.
And general tone of your posts is quite clear: stupid personal snipes.
The only sly jab here is Valve's lies and damn lies. ATI should sue them if their contract allows.
Richthofen said:for what?
ATI was aware of the delay well in advance.
Guess what it did not stop them to do their promotion. They were lying to customers too.
Anyone who thinks they knew nothing is a fool.
They knew it and i have the feeling that the whole leak story was just an cheap excuse both agreed on to get out of that fiasco in the best way they can.
Really i don't believe anything valve and ati are saying about HL2 and Readeon performance.
They have been in bed together since day 1 and ATI payed a lot of money to get the good PR.
Now i think its time both of them get a feeling of the bad PR too when you don't deliver as promised.
None of them is innocent they deserve the full bad PR in that matter. Simple business rules.
John Reynolds said:This board needs an ignore option.
karlotta said:lots of talk about nothing. Only trolling, the topic is about benching on a game that is warz and not current, the nvida card is on the DX8 path..pifft, the other game is on the DX8 build... kinda funny how some ppl posting only find fault in the relationship between Valve and ATI? and think they are lieing to there consummers with no true proof.. but lots of duh looks that way, (and it does ..duh), but wont even for one second think of the id nivdia relationship, and all the BS that add up to lies in my book. All because of a fixed date..lol you guys are morooons DC is so transparent but the rest are just fanbois. The bottom line is anybody who bought a R3xx card to get the voucher still has the voucher and will have a card that is faster than any nv3x choice they had at the time of puchase. PLZ LIE TO ME SOMEMORE SO I CAN SAVE MORE MONEY ON THE NEXT GREAT GAME!!! Then there is the nv3x NEED I SAY MORE
ATI, may have lied, but still has great card and freegame.
nVida, DID lie, cheat, has lesser card and NO FREEGAME
one is not a DX9 build, and the other is leting one card run on the DX8 path......Maintank said:Both cards look awfully equal in those "highly anticipated DX9" games