Doomtrooper
Veteran
Doomtrooper said:
Doom 3 was announced in 2002..."coming summer 2003"
An ISV isn't going to let someone pour over every line of code - there is always going to be an element of trust that what the ISV is saying is something close to what will happen.AlphaOmega said:2. from my understanding ATI had full knowledge of the dilemna. Some ppl here do professional business, but let me clearify this, if u arn't communicating with your business partner and tackling an issue together your going to lose alot of credibility atleast in the business world. No one wants to do business with someone who hides their messes instead of trying to clean up. yet if some of you are implying that ATI was a victim and knew just a little more then u then hmmm, seems like ATI doesn't know how to do business!(sarcasim).
DaveBaumann said:An ISV isn't going to let someone pour over every line of code - there is always going to be an element of trust that what the ISV is saying is something close to what will happen.
Chris123234 said:*Yawn* You guys are pathetic. When I left this place last year because of lacking enthusiasm in the slowing graphics market and other outside factors this place was full of smart discussion that made me think "Wow, these guys are fucking smart. I wish more boards were as mature as this".
Now I come back and I see you new guys bitching and fighting with these guys that have been here ages. Its pretty rediculous really....
Anyways back to the point. To see what the betas are running, look at the scores for the last generation cards and see if they line of to the scores of the old reviews that used the old betas. Then youd know if they were the same, and therefore how they are running in these benchmarks.
As for the nv3x shit path in HL2; why wouldnt the nv40 be running on it? Its nV hardware so it eaither runs DX8 or mixed mode right? assuming its the same version used in past reviews.