I've just heard there's a possibility that a new part is coming in to fill the "8800-GTX-8800-Ultra's-single-GPU's-shoes" sooner than we thought...
Frankly i can't seem to grasp how it could go unnoticed for so long, but we'll find out soon enough.
What does it mean?? You`re talking about GF8800GT??
Higher than 8800 GTS or 8800 GT, that's what i understood from his words.
But hey, it's just the rumor of a possibility, so take that news lightly.
I've just heard there's a possibility that a new part is coming in to fill the "8800-GTX-8800-Ultra's-single-GPU's-shoes" sooner than we thought...
Frankly i can't seem to grasp how it could go unnoticed for so long, but we'll find out soon enough.
False and/or random bullshit.Foxcon 8800GT = G96 ???
False and/or random bullshit.gpureview says it has 32/24 setup, just like GTX. what you all think, i think its false.
I've just heard there's a possibility that a new part is coming in to fill the "8800-GTX-8800-Ultra's-single-GPU's-shoes" sooner than we thought...
Frankly i can't seem to grasp how it could go unnoticed for so long, but we'll find out soon enough.
Why we need a G90, when we have a G92 with 289mm² @65nm, who already is able to do 600/1500MHz @1.05V?
Not with 7 clusters and 1.05V...Pssssh, I'm already doing 650/1600 on my GTS.
What about ~800/2400MHz, with a consumption on 88GTX-level or a bit below like I heard?I want bigger numbers!!
Not with 7 clusters and 1.05V...
What about ~800/2400MHz, with a consumption on 88GTX-level or a bit below like I heard?
What about ~800/2400MHz, with a consumption on 88GTX-level or a bit below like I heard?