Gholbine said:So why ask a question if you won't accept the answer?
You've been talking like a game that can run on the PS3 and not the Xbox 360 is an impossibility, and he just proved you wrong. Nothing more to it.
Gholbine said:Does the PS3 not have a higher FLOPs rating? Does it not have faster main memory? Does it not have more high-speed local storage? Does it not run more hardware threads? Everything he said is absolutely true. If there's something about it you don't understand, be sure to ask, because I'm sure he'd be happy to answer your query.
PC-Engine said:Those are the factors that point to KZ CGI is possible on PS3? What a joke.
Thanks for your utterly useful and well thought out response. I feel smarter after having attempted a conversation with you.Thanks for your observation as if it's worth something.
PC-Engine said:What does that have anything to do with Xbox360 not being able to run MGS4?
PC-Engine said:You are incoherently ranting now
So why ask if you've already made up your mind to ignore and patronize any answer I could possibly give you?
Thanks for your utterly useful and well thought out response. I feel smarter after having attempted a conversation with you.
What if the game engine is running 9 synchronous hardware threads and utilizing 200GFLOPs per second? You'd struggle to run that on the Xbox 360, wouldn't you. It's really not that difficult to understand, even for you, but I'm guessing you just choose not to understand.
PC-Engine said:Who said I already made up my mind? What you're a mind reader now? I asked because I wanted to know, but when I read your reasons, I realized there's not point in arguing with you since your reasons are a joke. So instead of arguing further I'll just sit back and enjoy the comedy.
Gholbine said:Heh, at least now I know why there are so many people that just ignore your posts, PC-Engine. You're in a world of your own.
Alright! A link to more people on a forum without any known expertise in the area expressing their opinions. I guess I should accept that as gospel truth right PC?PC-Engine said:
ANova said:Alright! A link to more people on a forum without any known expertise in the area expressing their opinions. I guess I should accept that as gospel truth right PC?
According to you? That means jack and shit.PC-Engine said:Uh..there are at least 2 people there who definitely have a clue. You OTOH will never get it.
Vysez said:And, to some people, just an advice, when you see a troll, do not feed it.
No, I am saying that I will quote a response you made to another poster and that I will also disagree with you, but I don't want you to think I fully agree with Gholbine, the person to whom you were responding in the words I quoted.AlphaWolf said:er... are you saying you want to address my post out of context?
So? This is indeed an equalizer. An equalizer of cost, not performance. You seem to be talking about something completely different or are you saying that Pentium 4, Athlon 64, and PowerPC chips existing within the same time period have the exact same performance characteristics?The same processes exist in the same time period.