http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=258_0_2_0_C
Interesting tid-bits:
Interesting read overall... worth a good 2-5 minutes oif your time... maybe
Actually, I recommend Parts 1: http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=246_0_2_0_C
and Part 2: http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=250_0_2_0_C
I had no idea Sony wants to buy Palm, or atleast their OS segement. I also think if they can execute on their OS/Cell - they'll be the dominent player in the electronic industry. Their vision of the broadband distributed digital media (all based on Cell/OS and thus interconnected, and the cell-phone music is cool) seems to be solid... if they don't fuck up.
Interesting tid-bits:
Perkins: Do you worry about the Xbox?
Idei: No, not at all.
Perkins: Why not?
Idei: Because Microsoft is losing money producing the hardware, and their losses are getting bigger. We shipped 25 million on our first product and made money, they shipped 8 million and lost money. This is a huge difference. They also can't produce hardware and integrate graphics chips into their product—they have to buy it from someone else. They can't compete with Sony, because they can't match our margins.
Idei: The second platform will tie together the PlayStation, the home server, and the TV. We have announced jointly with Panasonic and Philips that we have agreed on the basic Linux kernel for this platform. Based on this Linux kernel, we are developing the middleware and the application interfaces so that our PlayStation, future TVs, and future home video cameras will all work on a single platform.
For this to work, we need to accommodate an operating system on top of this middleware. In the consumer electronics industry, however, few people understand OS architecture, so it would be hard for any of us to compete in the operating software area. Even at Sony, where we have many smart software developers, we still can't compete with the IT industry in this area. But we still need to define this platform and what part of it we want to control, and we want this platform to be open so it gets widely adopted.
Perkins: The problem we are trying to solve here is about the consumer experience on top of any OS. The test model for this is what Steve Jobs just did with Jaguar. Personally, I got iTunes, iPhoto, iMovies all running on one server at home, and it's transparent. If I plug a DVD in or an iPod in, the icon automatically comes up on my screen. When I plug my Sony Cyber-shot camera into my Mac, I don’t have to do anything, because it assumes I want to see the pictures in the camera so it automatically brings up the iPhoto interface. I don't even have to touch my mouse! This is the model for Sony.
Idei: We actually met several times with Steve last year, in January, March, and June to try to work out a mutual strategy. But you know Steve, he has his own agenda. [Laughs.] Although he is a genius, he doesn't share everything with you. This is a difficult person to work with if you are a big company. We started working with them, but it is a nightmare. We have the exact type of guy like Steve within Sony. His name is Ken Kutaragi. They respect each other. So maybe if we can get them both together then they could figure out how the PlayStation and the Mac can work together.
Interesting read overall... worth a good 2-5 minutes oif your time... maybe
Actually, I recommend Parts 1: http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=246_0_2_0_C
and Part 2: http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=250_0_2_0_C
I had no idea Sony wants to buy Palm, or atleast their OS segement. I also think if they can execute on their OS/Cell - they'll be the dominent player in the electronic industry. Their vision of the broadband distributed digital media (all based on Cell/OS and thus interconnected, and the cell-phone music is cool) seems to be solid... if they don't fuck up.