Yes, but why is CF2.0 being marketed under RV670 only?
Is this your slide stating?
I would not say "only", "together" seems more sensible, because HD2600 X2 will be officialy announced soon.
Yes, but why is CF2.0 being marketed under RV670 only?
CF 2.0: seems to be 3-way and 4-way-configurations and the possibility to use all outputs of the cards even in CF-mode.
Sure there can be more, but the this stuff should already much work for the driver-team.
Hehe. Ok... so my next guess is that tomorrow they'll post that RV670 will after all be launched (not a paper launch) in November. First thing I heard earlier this week was mid-November, but today I was told late November.
Fudzilla said:With 256 bit memory and 55 nm
RV670 will be a mainstream part that ATI plans to offer from November, but there is someething that Nvidia doesn't expect from this chip....
Yes, but why is CF2.0 being marketed under RV670 only?
but there is someething that Nvidia doesn't expect from this chip....
...which would be done by...?More like partly fixing the AA perfromance problem.
...which would be done by...?
Link? 3/4-way CF I can see, but multi-display is something neither vendor has overcome yet. I would love to see it happen though.
Extended Desktop
8.45 (Vista only, 2 displays)
8.47 (XP) Dec Jan
Awesome! It was high time one of the two IHVs focused on fixing this problem.It will happen.... for 2 displays at least. This is what my info says about which driver versions should support it:
Excellent question, as a total re-design is out of the question I would expect smaller hardware changes and perhaps some driver tweaks that could imrpove AA performance, as ATI is said to claim.
To answer the question how they want to do it, one would need to know which part of the R600 way is the bottleneck. Maybe color compression working again ?
It's not working? Care to show some evidence?Maybe color compression working again ?
It will happen.... for 2 displays at least. This is what my info says about which driver versions should support it: