So, do we know anything about RV670 yet?

Its not that great, because this can generate to high expectations/hype, and when NV silent launch something what kick the rv670 in the butt than only thing can come is the dissapointment over rv670.

Yes, in the retail market. But for the OEM market it is different. Not the first tier OEMs (who already know both products) but more for the smaller, that are not worth doing an NDA, yet still go for 1000+ cards. At the moment NV (or their board partners) seems confident, only pointing oit that GeForce 8X00 has not been bad so far, while you hear more promises/rumors from the other side.
 
rv6701ay5.jpg

http://news.expreview.com/2007-09-28/1190967523d3801.html
 
If that slide's true, then that's double precision, which I wasn't really expecting from ATI for a fair while longer.

Jawed
 
Gah if there is one that that's dissapointed me about AMD this round (and Nvidia last round) is the apparent focus on a GX2 style card as the high end. :(

Unless they've come up with some revolutionary way to handle multi-GPU rendering that has somehow not leaked onto some forum somewhere, it's just not looking too promising.

I can deal with slower than expected performance if it brings something new to the table (R600), but a GX2 style card is the devil's child as far as I'm concerned. Shame... Granted I'm sure their marketing will love it if it manages to claim top spot in select benchmarks (ala 7950 GX2).

Regards,
SB
 
SB- I have hope that Crossfire 2.0 address the main issues with multi GPU rendering. In the mean time, I'm not sure if this is a marketing and collective initiative to garner more platform mind share. Maybe it's a initiative to improve AFR rendering and perhaps a new platform approch to how crossfire works. I say this because RV670 is CF2.0 ready from marketing slides I can gather. But what does this mean?
 
CF 2.0: seems to be 3-way and 4-way-configurations and the possibility to use all outputs of the cards even in CF-mode.

Sure there can be more, but the this stuff should already much work for the driver-team.
 
CF 2.0: seems to be 3-way and 4-way-configurations and the possibility to use all outputs of the cards even in CF-mode.

Sure there can be more, but the this stuff should already much work for the driver-team.

Yes, but why is CF2.0 being marketed under RV670 only? Maybe their are hardware limitations that had to be overcome. Ohh, it would be nice to have multi monitor support with CF. I'm also aware of tri fire and quad fire, but they can't add anymore without somewhat improving the issues at hand now.
 
Back
Top