Well they have the overall performance crown now, both in dual and in single GPU's. Thats gotta be worth something.
Not in a resounding ass kicking manner though.
Well they have the overall performance crown now, both in dual and in single GPU's. Thats gotta be worth something.
Not in a resounding ass kicking manner though.
Yesterday ATI had te fastest graphics card, today NV has it.... I think that counts for a lot.
I'm really hoping AMD's next-gen high end chip is 20 ROPs / 320bit.Lets see another Athlon64 / 9700 Pro....
It only counts if it's significant.
I'm really hoping AMD's next-gen high end chip is 20 ROPs / 320bit.
That noob goes to more honest shops than me. Around here that is mainly a good way of finding out which card has the best commission.
If they double TMUs and SPs, hopefully they will put 8 ROPs in their MC-clusters, so a total of 32 while stay at 256-Bit,
I think there's enough times when GTX260-216 and GTX295 beat HD4870-1GB and HD4870X2 to indicate that fillrate and texture rate are somewhat lacking. More emphasis on framerate minima would make this clearer, I reckon, though getting down to nitty-gritty in given games is something I've found pretty difficult with the reviews out there.Fillrate hasn't really been a performance issue for AMD... bandwidth & shader throughput are where it's at for the next gen.
ive only seen the 295 benched against the 260 its not twice as fast
given that the 285 is single gpu it could be slower than a 260 (depends how bad the sli scaling is)
I thought the 295 was a board with 2x285 gpu's am i wrong ?
ps: that comment was just me thinking aloud after spending a good 3 seconds thinking about it - dont read too much into it
so whats a 285 ?