Anand posted the system specs he used, half way down this thread: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=44&threadid=896802
I'm not being "silly", I'm just following your "suggestion" of not talking about another site's promised-but-non-existant review. Nothing wrong with that, right?DaveBaumann said:Reverend said:I better not talk anymore about this as it's considered spam.
<sigh>
No Rev, stop being silly.
Reverend said:I'm not being "silly", I'm just following your "suggestion" of not talking about another site's promised-but-non-existant review. Nothing wrong with that, right?DaveBaumann said:Reverend said:I better not talk anymore about this as it's considered spam.
<sigh>
No Rev, stop being silly.
How quickly friends seem to disappear. And how quickly a site can become a "competitive site" instead of being a friendly place of discussion regardless of who-from-which-website is posting.John Reynolds said:Well, I think anyone would differentiate between a poster asking when a review is going up and answering them (I've been curious myself) and the actual reviewer starting 2-3 new threads on an unpublished review.
Reverend said:Remember, the majority of Net users are US citizens and someone said that more than half of US citizens thought humans existed with dinos (that stat doesn't exist in Malaysia). You really can't tell who-on-the-Net can differentiate what nowadays...
Reverend said:You really can't tell who-on-the-Net can differentiate what nowadays...
Reverend said:Remember, the majority of Net users are US citizens <snip>
82% of the global bandwidth is in Europe
82% of the cross-border (or "international border") bandwidth
Chalnoth said:...anybody should consider waiting at least a month or two...
Uhm, if it was cross-continent, no figure could be bigger than the sum of the other fourJoe DeFuria said:Cross-border is not defined meaningfully that I can tell: cross-country border? Cross-continent border? Though it appears to me that this only indicates that the U.S. browses to most of its content from U.S. sources, and Europe gets most of its content from non European sources. Doesn't really say who uses more more bandwidth in general.
In any case.....it looks like the U.S. has most of the content that the 'net wants.
and just what does the number of porn sites have to do with overclocking the 9500?
Joe DeFuria said:and just what does the number of porn sites have to do with overclocking the 9500?
If you insist....
The 9500 contains the Videoshader technology of the R-300. So all those "compressed" and blocky porn videos can get smoothed out. As we know, pixel shading performance can depend on the clock speed, so....
The more you overclock the 9500, the better the porn experience at all those websites!
martrox said:and just what does the number of porn sites have to do with overclocking the 9500?
i still have an 8500 and it kicks a gf4 4400's ass in the same system. a gf4 may get like 10fps more in the latest propaghanda assed war game, but porno looks better with an 8500 and thats what matters.