Weird, I don't see 8 TFLOPs anywhere. Nor 9.2TFLOPs.
? How is that different than typical boost clocks?
Git Hub was 36CUs. Different clocks would get diferrence TFlops. The 10 TF number is boosted clocks which may not be maintained when things get hot*. The GitHub gospel totally won this one; the Insiders had absolutely nothing but empty promises.Weird, I don't see 8 TFLOPs anywhere. Nor 9.2TFLOPs.
We must be seeing a different specs table. Maybe it's a localization issue with Eurogamer.
Yes, I'm the one who needs to cope with a 15% difference in compute throughput (with a significantly faster back-end) instead of your dear promised 33%.TeamGitHub was about 36 CUs, but do whatever you need to cope.
Git Hub was 36CUs. Different clocks would get diferrence TFlops. The 10 TF number is boosted clocks which may not be maintained when things get hot. The GitHub gospel totally won this one; the Insiders had absolutely nothing but empty promises.
Git Hub was 36CUs. Different clocks would get diferrence TFlops. The 10 TF number is boosted clocks which may not be maintained when things get hot. The GitHub gospel totally won this one; the Insiders had absolutely nothing but empty promises.
Please go to era for fanboy fights.
Sounds like Boost was bolted on in order to achieve +10TF. There's no way it was designed like that from the beginning??
Tommy McClain
So how's GAF coping? Is it even more of a dumpster fire now?
Eh, they still have games.PS5 is a failure in many respects to XBSX.
Yea, mate. Everyone here is super dumb.Weird, I don't see 8 TFLOPs anywhere. Nor 9.2TFLOPs.
We must be seeing a different specs table. Maybe it's a localization issue with Eurogamer.
gc_ea_gddr6_1750MHz_2GB_2GB1Cs_16b_BankGroupEn0_RecEn_perf.gfxclk2000.oberon.ini"
PS5 is a failure in many respects to XBSX.