Exposure to gamma radiation?I don't understand why anyone would be angry.
And it looks like it might just be a week. Hardly world shaking.I don't understand why anyone would be angry. A little annoyed, perhaps, but this is a tiny frustration as far as I'm concerned*. Doesn't warrant any sizeable emotions.
* Personally I'm completely indifferent. It'll happen when it happens. I guess that's just being patient, although I'm also not emotionally invested in the platform and I'm not looking forwards to the reveal with any excitement.
Could be anything. It's wrong to think little games aren't cared about by anyone though. The majority, sure, but sometimes an odd fringe title is someone's favourite. An example from myself, Age of Booty on PS3. It's a great little game with no alternatives. Now if that was a PS4 title and I learned it wasn't coming to PS5 because the devs aren't going to fix it but it was on XB, that'd increase the chances of me picking XB because it feels 'safer'. For the vast majority of people, they only care about their games, and aren't interested in games other people may like. If Sony secures the majority, that's probably the best compromise, especially if that's a very large majority. But we shouldn't dismiss 'little games' as games no-one cares anything about. That effectively associates 'little' with 'a bit crap and pointless'.
Sure and I think that'll work. There are old games I'd like to play and can't, and I just live with it (maybe I'm supposed to be getting angry! ). Old titles will still run on the old console also, and maybe two generations on, we get BC again? I'm far more interested in PS1/2/3 BC than PS4.Point is Sony are trying the most popular games first, thus minimising any large scale complaint/mass migration to Xbox...much like the choice to buy a console, its not one thing it's the sum of all the things. I guess it could be the straw that breaks the back - I mean, to use my example - if ND switched to Xbox then that would be hard for me to take.
Sure and I think that'll work. There are old games I'd like to play and can't, and I just live with it (maybe I'm supposed to be getting angry! ). Old titles will still run on the old console also, and maybe two generations on, we get BC again? I'm far more interested in PS1/2/3 BC than PS4.
Only a few PS3 models were fully BC with PS2.Ps3 already has ps1 2 and obvious ps3 compat. Buying one of those is still an option for legacy software. I think Its important that ps5 has as much ps4 compat as possible first and foremost. Then you only need two platforms instead of more
Ps4 is where a majority of digital purchases in ps have been by far, so securing digital libraries for thar ecosystem is paramount
Only a few PS3 models were fully BC with PS2.
And honestly, if the PS5 is going to be BC just with PS4, I will be VERY disappointed.
Yeah, I know it can be a hassle and even arise some issues, but it's not impossible either. For us gamers it can be a bit annoying to have more than two consoles of the same family wired up at the same time. I mean, I still play some original PS games and I can't use my PS4, so I have to use my PS3. If the PS3 was perfectly fine running PS games, why they decided not to feature that into the PS4?Prepare to be disappointed. There is far less reason to support ps3 ps2 or ps1 compat on ps5 due to ps4s success, ps3 having full ps1 support and partial ps2 support with psn offering tons of ps2 titles to choose from, and it in general just being far more of a hassle attempting multiple gens of different architecture with all the licensing and potential emulation issues associated with the cost.
Prepare to be disappointed. There is far less reason(or incentive) to support ps3 ps2 or ps1 compat on ps5 due to ps4s success without it, ps3 having full ps1 support and partial ps2 support with psn offering tons of ps2 titles to choose from, and it in general just being far more of a hassle attempting multiple gens of different architecture with all the licensing and potential emulation issues associated with the cost.
Ms's investment into bc was insane resources wise and that still only yielded a relatively small percentage of og xbox and 360 titles with them wanting to sell them on the store as well. Id expect any attempt by sony to be three times as hard and end up about the same as their ps2 emulation on ps4.
Psnow seems as far as that goes
It'll be the ones that tie game performance(fps) to various systems. Destiny 2 had that issue when they started supporting PC. They had weapon stats and some movements stats tied to fps. Same goes for some japanese games where the same practices wee used. Running those on native PS5 hardware will probably result in some funny business.I find it hard to believe that there will be a few PS4 games that you can't play on the PS5. I mean how very different is the insturctions/sub-instructions/extensions designed by AMD for the PS5 that it won't be able to support PS4 games? We know that you can play DX9 games still on a DX12 cards and yes Sony won't be using DX but what ever new version of the PSSL, GNM, GNMX they have, should be backwards compatible surely?
Tying this with what I said above, wonder if Bloodborne was one of the games tested.Where did he say that? I know he said most of the top 100 were working...which implies not all games work. Think something like PS2 BC where it was like 99%
PS5 is well spec'd to run existing PS emulators. Sony should be able to come up with something, even if just licensing some such emu like they did for their PlayStation Classic which uses PCSX ReARMed.