DemoCoder said:Dave, Why is that, because they didn't use eDRAM? Even if they had all the time in the world, they may have still decided against eDRAM.
persiannight said:Doesn't look all that radically different then 360.. kind of what we all expected no??
DemoCoder said:I don't get where they are pulling the 2 TFlops figure from. Even if you assume a 24-pipe GPU @ 500Mhz, and 2 ALU SIMD ops per pipe, that gives you only 96flops. How do they go from 200gflops CELL to 2 teraflops just with the NV GPU?
DeanoC said:http://www.gamedaily.com/playstation2/e3guide/article.asp?section=feature&article_id=642
"NVidia is working with Sony on the "RSX Reality Synthesizer" for the PS3. It will be able to produce "movie quality" graphics at 60 FPS."
No, GameSpot had mistaken it. They corrected it already.hupfinsgack said:DemoCoder said:I don't get where they are pulling the 2 TFlops figure from. Even if you assume a 24-pipe GPU @ 500Mhz, and 2 ALU SIMD ops per pipe, that gives you only 96flops. How do they go from 200gflops CELL to 2 teraflops just with the NV GPU?
It's an arbitrary figure just like MS 1 TFlop....
Vennt said:http://www.cgno.com/news_live.php?name=sony
" The nVidia-powered graphics are twice as powerful as a GeForce 6800 Ultra. "
nAo said:Toshiba GPU was called RS