I know these are lame, but I was honestly tempted to get one. They were not that much and I had thouht about trying to remove my old TNT2 ultra core ages ago for something like this so perhaps that is why.
- Status
I know these are lame, but I was honestly tempted to get one. They were not that much and I had thouht about trying to remove my old TNT2 ultra core ages ago for something like this so perhaps that is why.
Jawed
Legend
Sorry, it's a secret. You know, NDA and all?
It was a real G98 encapsulated in plastic as a keychain. $10:
http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/04/nvidia_g98_keychain.html
Jawed
it was this
Rather lame I thought. I made a pair of ear-rings for my missus from the Celeron 366s that used to inhabit my BP6, but her ears couldn't take the weight. Stupid ears
Why not? They sold right? There is nothing wrong with coming up with a new market for your product even if it is useless.
Nvidia's reporting on thursday for the quarter from Barrons:
Hopefully the analysts will ask some decent questions at the conference call ie how's their x86 design progressing? the problems they are having with the 40nm ramp and the wild rumour they are taking their 40nm designs to UMC? Obviously their dx11 parts, progress on ion and tegra, commodization of their core business and finally some $$ projections over the next few quarters/years on gpgpu.
If true, something for everyone - if your optimist really good against what they did last quarter($481m), if your a pessimist not so good compared to the same quarter last year($1153m).
Hopefully the analysts will ask some decent questions at the conference call ie how's their x86 design progressing? the problems they are having with the 40nm ramp and the wild rumour they are taking their 40nm designs to UMC? Obviously their dx11 parts, progress on ion and tegra, commodization of their core business and finally some $$ projections over the next few quarters/years on gpgpu.
rendezvous
Regular
rendezvous, you're right, but when it comes to x86 if an analyst was smart enough you could come up with a really good question that Jen-Hsun just couldn't resist to answer. That happened once in early 2007 and he gave quite a revealing answer, but later comments implied his position had changed quite a bit. On the rest though, any analyst would indeed be wasting his time...
Silent_Buddha
Legend
Most of that increase quarter on quarter from Q4 08 is the fact that they wrote down (took the hit) on existing inventory in Q4 08.
After that, those products are being cleared and thus are basically selling for pure profit.
Hopefully they include it in their financial breakdown like AMD did for how much it made from selling items that was written down in Q4 08.
Regards,
SB
Revenue came in at $664m quite a bit above what was forecast. Gross margins are way down 28.6%. Expecting this to recover somewhat to 32-34% on a 5% increase of sales in the second quarter.
Re getting answers to your questions. Obviously it would be a waste of time to ask them in a direct fashion as just gets the execs back up.
ie For the commodization of their business, perhaps try asking about margins and whether they expect it to get anywhere near 40% before the end of the year. A negative or hesitant answer, implies they know their main gpu business is headed towards commodity.
Similarly for their 40nm products, the first 3 reside in the mainstream segment, could simply ask how that segment is expected to perform over the next quarter or two. Also with suppliers(this is more difficult to get a good answer) ask if they expect any cost savings from there or merely a continuation ie status quo at the current price levels.
Finally for GPGPU they need to give investors some hope that it will make $$ in the future.
Not the transcript, but some brief notes on the CC:
Conference call transcript is here.
Re getting answers to your questions. Obviously it would be a waste of time to ask them in a direct fashion as just gets the execs back up.
ie For the commodization of their business, perhaps try asking about margins and whether they expect it to get anywhere near 40% before the end of the year. A negative or hesitant answer, implies they know their main gpu business is headed towards commodity.
Similarly for their 40nm products, the first 3 reside in the mainstream segment, could simply ask how that segment is expected to perform over the next quarter or two. Also with suppliers(this is more difficult to get a good answer) ask if they expect any cost savings from there or merely a continuation ie status quo at the current price levels.
Finally for GPGPU they need to give investors some hope that it will make $$ in the future.
Not the transcript, but some brief notes on the CC:
Conference call transcript is here.
Last edited by a moderator:
Jawed
Legend
Prolly waiting to tell us that AMD forced NVidia to give-up ~6% in gross margins through drastically cutting prices in order to buy market share.
Jawed
Silent_Buddha
Legend
OK, that was a bit of a shocker for me. I was expecting Nvidia's margins to be up greatly similar to how AMD's margins are up.
Considering AMD is in a price war with not only Nvidia but a much more aggressive Intel, I really had been under the assumption that Nvidia's margins would be 30% at the very least.
Was anything mentioned about how much profit/loss was made?
Regards,
SB
Considering AMD is in a price war with not only Nvidia but a much more aggressive Intel, I really had been under the assumption that Nvidia's margins would be 30% at the very least.
Was anything mentioned about how much profit/loss was made?
Regards,
SB
16%, or $106M, of their revenue came from high margin workstation business as well. Desktop margins must be fairly horrible...
http://seekingalpha.com/article/136355-nvidia-f1q10-qtr-end-4-26-09-earnings-call-transcript?page=-1
- Status
Similar threads
