I KNOW but Kyle inferred it at original time of article and if you followed their forum actually reinforced that both GAMING and STRIX would NOT be allowed by not correcting his moderators, and was also picked up like that by other news sites reporting his investigation or when he was interviewed.
You misread my original post context.
Again my post was nothing to do with what is good/bad about GPP but the relevant posts just before mine on same context-subject regarding Gamers Nexus, HardOCP-Kyle, and Ryan Smith, amongst other journalists reporting GPP and what was validated afterwards/methodology.
GamersNexus provided a better context than Kyle IMO, but took longer to get validated facts with context; maybe now though more journalists will be able to dig deeper into this and look forward to analysis if possible from other such as Ryan (who was persisting in trying to do proofed investigation).
Which leads on to the headache AMD is going to have with Intel being headstrong and heavy handed with their agreements and Nvidia looking to pick a fight head on by being just or even more aggressive (and more negative with the Geforce culture), especially if Intel moves quickly with some kind of improved CPU-GPU in future and AMD caught between the two sharks fighting (the aggressive partner-product strategy approach from both is what will hurt AMD).
However to reiterate Kyle does get Kudos for getting this subject traction, which would not have happened without his initial piece, although he is not doing himself any service in attacking some other journalists such as Ryan who has a different journalistic methodology to him.
Last edited:
