/For the new member's sake
http://forum.beyond3d.com/faq.php?faq=b3dfaqs#faq_therules
http://forum.beyond3d.com/faq.php?faq=b3dfaqs#faq_therules
NVIDIA GF100 & Friends speculation
- Thread starter Arty
- Start date
I would hazard a guess that info is being kept tight and will be revealed sometime before Cebit is over from Nvidia itself.
rpg.314 said:
Well, considering there's more than a handful of TWIMPTB titles, a few titles with phsyx including the upcoming Metro2033 (Which I'm going to hazard another guess and say it's going to be shown at Cebit with no FPS# visible but still running) that's been heavily supported by Nvidia. Along with a few titles still that have a performance bias towards nvidia I'd suspect they'd be showing the titles that they have a strength in, and people will buy based somewhat on those numbers. Not to mention there should be a folding/benchmarking improvement, brand loyalty, etc.
rpg.314 said:
No problem at all. Was just asking.
Ah, I see now. I get the basic math of it, just didn't know if he had done any searching into a possible VAT% difference along with any other factors from cards that are on sale now (Would be a tad closer to real numbers I'd think.) And I'd guess 470 being at the least 350, with a high chance of it being 400$Silus said:
Found that right after I was puzzled about lack of editing and the explanation. Tried to find it before posting and failed. Thank you very much for the extra heads up though.rpg.314 said:
Sorry for the off-topic, but i still cant send PMs. Hey Silus! Nice to see someone from Portugal too
Hi Picao84! Same here
PMs, the edit button and more, all require a certain number of posts, to be available. Follow the link rpg.314 posted for more info.
10 channels of memory, 320-bit bus: GTX470 I suppose.
Jawed
With 2x 6pin power.
Hello Mr. BlurryCam
Well, isn't it about time we got some leaks, if the release is only a couple of weeks away!
May also have something to do with the delays, at least in some small part. Designing two different PCBs would no doubt take more engineering resources, and I have to assume more time unless there are two design teams operating independently.
FrameBuffer
Banned
any PSP/Paint gurus able to take a 5800 and maybe overlay the pictured 470 (matching PCIe tongue etc) and possibly GF200 product ? I would assume NV stuck with the same mounting holes for the cooler/pcb to help alleviate costs to partners.
FrameBuffer
Banned
but isn't PCIe 2.0 inherently backwards compatible with PCI 1.x ? They both deliver 75W right ? Just 2.x upped the data per pin (well actually I think clock rate was doubled from 2.5Ghz to 5.0 Ghz from 1.0 to 2.0).. I mean it's not like when AGP 1.0 used 3.3v then 2.0 moved to 1.5 .. some users inadvertently killing their cards/systems by trying to use them together.
If that's the case then why put PIC-E 2.0 explicitly on the box as a requirement?
The only requirement I see is PCI Express or PCI Express 2.0-compliant motherboard.
Whoops, you're right. Good to know that this P35 mainboard will last me another 2-3 years years.
Silent_Buddha
Legend
/HUGE_sigh...
No Display Port makes me a very sad panda. Means it's unlikely for ultra thin Direct Drive monitors to appear anytime soon.
Regards,
SB
FenderBender
Newcomer
Like the way you put that NO2 boost system into your stock Smart car?
Aside from PCI-E 2.0 the P35 chipset isn't really missing anything. I'm running a 45mn Yorkdale Quad Core OC'ed to 3.4 Ghz. Why on earth would I upgrade that? For a few % more CPU performance that I don't even need? The only thing I feel like upgrading is my GTX 260... and I really hope that Fermi doesn't suck.
Similar threads
- Deleted member 2197
- Architecture and Products
