Nvidia Blackwell Architecture Speculation

  • Thread starter Deleted member 2197
  • Start date
Man from Atlantis said:
My guess is that the outer yellow one is the I/O daughterboard mezzanine connector, and the green one is for the PCIe Gen5 daugtherboard. Could be vice versa but this seems to make it easier to route the ribbon cables.
View attachment 12807View attachment 12808

NVIDIA's Unreleased TITAN/Ti Prototype Cooler & PCB | Thermals, Acoustics, Tear-Down. A similar mezzanine connector for the PCIe daughterboard on the prototype RTX 4090 PCB, courtesy of GamersNexus

View attachment 12809
Click to expand...
Ggz06G4WAAAt0kt.jpg
Actual photo of the back of the main PCB. I'm curious about the acoustic performance of the new miniature chokes and whether they'll produce coil whine.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1877144442030666198

5090 FE Design Discussion with Justin Walker, Nvidia Sr. Director of Products
 
So, GB202 has 128 MByte L2-Cache, if I'm interpreting the 8 x 16 MByte partitions in that picture correctly. Forgive me, but the search has not come up with anything regarding L2 size except rumors from a year ago.

Image taken from Nvidias Website.
 

Attachments

  • nvidia-blackwell-die-shot.png
    nvidia-blackwell-die-shot.png
    863.2 KB · Views: 13
To be fair, FP4 is now widely used in LLM inference. 40-series does support INT4 but it's not very useful. Of course, comparision between FP4 and FP16 is probably not a good sport, but AFAIK people has found that using FP4 with twice as many parameters generally perform better than FP8 (the same goes to using FP8 with twice many parameters compared to FP16), so generally it'd be preferable to use FP4 if a larger model is available.
 
raytracingfan said:
Do we know if the RTX 50 series still have the hardware optical flow accelerators, and if so, whether they serve any purpose for regular consumers or are just dead silicon?
Click to expand...
They'll still exist, they just wont be used for any special graphics features this time round, outside potentially for fallback if DLSS3 framegen gets used instead of the new DLSS4 model.
 
DegustatoR said:
That list disregards any architectural changes between families and as such is just as misleading as anything else.
Click to expand...
Do you really expect significant architectural gains in like for like work other than the support for things like FP4? I certainly don't and the performance numbers provided certainly don't suggest a massive improvement in architecture..... If we can find a 4000 series card that's close enough in specs to a 5000 series variant and then compare them at the same clock speeds in like for like work, I don't think we'll see a massive improvement at all.
 
@RobertR1 The design opens up a lot of cooling options, especially if you have a creative case with a riser cable. I've always hated that cards have fans that force air onto the card pcb which ends up blowing air out the sides of the card, which them blows onto the side of your case and onto your motherboard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top