Nvidia DLSS 3 antialiasing discussion
- Thread starter TopSpoiler
- Start date
Yeah, more I think about it, the more it doesn't make any sense. Why would I want a NN to generate subpar frames, when I could just have my monitor or TV do a much better job for the same latency cost and 0 performance hit?
Edit: The only way it could make sense to me is if it is predictive, but that seems like a recipe for artifact city? Maybe us humans just won't/don't notice the glitches in the matrix? (x)
Edit: The only way it could make sense to me is if it is predictive, but that seems like a recipe for artifact city? Maybe us humans just won't/don't notice the glitches in the matrix? (x)
It is predictive (it uses previous frame + motion vectors + ofa) and it is artifact city. There's just enough people (here too) who completely avoid that particular side of the topic so it doesn't get much attention
Edit: here's my post from another thread for reference
NVidia Ada Speculation, Rumours and Discussion
Yes, but will it "feel" like 60 fps or will it still "feel" like 20/30 fps but look like 60 fps? The main input and game processing loop would still be at the lower raw rate, right? Apparently, Nvidias only answer to this is to include their Reflex low latency tech to lower latency in the first...
forum.beyond3d.com
Lol, well unless Nvidia is also planning on inventing time travel.... I'll pass.
Jeebus, that spiderman scene isn't even challenging and it screws up a static feature...
Lol at the shadow.... Ray trace your lighting to destroy the accuracy with a trash gimmick that artificially inflates FPS numbers.
Jeebus, that spiderman scene isn't even challenging and it screws up a static feature...
Lol at the shadow.... Ray trace your lighting to destroy the accuracy with a trash gimmick that artificially inflates FPS numbers.
Well DLSS 1 wasn't very good either but it was a necessary step to work towards what we have now, which is quite good. I personally don't like to discount a possible technology based on initial implementations. There are many commercial technologies that aren't very good at the start but require commercial use through consumers to reach their goals.
Yeah, I was wrong about DLSS and where it went 2.0 (it is great). Still a bit of softness but that is a good (correct) tradeoff to make, if you have to make one.
But NNs improving is one thing, time travel is another. You can also already get a much superior result with very little latency (at decent framerate), with solutions that already exist.
But NNs improving is one thing, time travel is another. You can also already get a much superior result with very little latency (at decent framerate), with solutions that already exist.
Which one? AFAIK there doesnt exist any latency free motion interpolation.
I've only seen that used on the actual card marketing materials, but not in these discussions.
DavidGraham
Veteran
Spider-Man still has troubles doing proper DLSS2 to this day (their upscaled RT refections require special handling when upscaling), so it's only natural that their early DLSS3 footage from the game has artifacts.
Comparatively, Cyberpunk and Flight Simulator made very solid showings for DLSS3.
So I would appreciate it, if you learn a little bit from the past 4 years, and wait before you shun a tech based on one early showing. Especially when you know that NVIDIA is going to constantly hammer it down to almost perfection.
Haven't checked FS myself but Cyberpunk exhibits similar, even if less pronounced, artifacts at least in parts of the DF preview (which was controlled by NV)
Similar threads
