couldn't agree morePeople who never wanted and have no intention of getting one are the ones complaining the loudest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
couldn't agree morePeople who never wanted and have no intention of getting one are the ones complaining the loudest.
couldn't agree more
People who want one now, can buy one now at $499. They have no reason to complain.
People who want one 3-4 months from now will be able to still buy one for $499. They have no reason to complain.
People who want more than 6 months from now should not even be affected by this news because 6 months from now the pricing strategy will likely be totally different. They have no reason to complain.
People who never wanted and have no intention of getting one are the ones complaining the loudest.
I'm inclined to believe Carl B has an inside source at this point. I noticed he was the first one saying the lower price on the 60GB was just to clear out stock, as if a hunch. Then sure enough a day or two later, that news was confirmed. I think it was more than a hunch.
But on this particular matter, somehow I still doubt him. I dont see why keep the 80Gb at 599 at all, even temporarily? Why pack in the game? Is the game still going to be packed in at 499? I doubt that, so why bother packing it in at all?
I just dont see any reason to announce a "temporarily" higher price on the 80GB model if the plan is to drop it once the 60GB sells through. It doesn't make any sense at all, as basically no 80GB models will sell through at the $599 price, if that's the case.
Whatever Sony is doing is very confusing, and they have basically removed all clarity and goodwill from the announce of $499. I can appreciate the simplicity of Sony only having one permanent sku, for example. But this whole matter has been not simple.
Even if they lose out on a few sales of a 80GB sku at 599 (and it can only be a few), just for simplicity's sake they should have said 499 and be done with it. All sku's, all the time.
People who want one now, can buy one now at $499. They have no reason to complain.
People who want one 3-4 months from now will be able to still buy one for $499. They have no reason to complain.
People who want more than 6 months from now should not even be affected by this news because 6 months from now the pricing strategy will likely be totally different. They have no reason to complain.
People who never wanted and have no intention of getting one are the ones complaining the loudest.
The PR side has been an absolute disaster too. Conflicting reports from different parts of Sony - in some cases appearing as one-after-the-other news posts (eg evilavatar).
Personally, I think the whole PR side of things is vastly overrated. I'd wager that the majority of people don't read forums. don't follow up on Sony PR, and have no clue in general about negative/positive things of that nature that happen in the background. More than likely they just walk into that store and see that the PS3 has dropped to $499. End of story for them. I don't think there is any mass confusion.
For those that do follow forums and assorted PR announcements, it's also completely moot. Those types of people have likely already formulated an opinion in their head and will spin whatever negative/positive PR that gets put out in a way to further their beliefs anyways.
Long story short, there is no 'situation' here. I think y'all are reading into this whole thing way too much.
the dreamcast was destroyed do to a lackluster game library and poor marketing, not by a couple flashy demos.
It was really about who had the most weight to throw around (brand recognition) and that was largely in favor of Sony. Sales of the Dreamcast had even died down (especially in Japan) as soon as a PS2 was announced as in the works....
well im sorry but your experience is niche. The Saturn flunked for the most part while the Playstation name grew from the mid 90s on. It was really about who had the most weight to throw around (brand recognition) and that was largely in favor of Sony. Sales of the Dreamcast had even died down (especially in Japan) as soon as a PS2 was announced as in the works, quite some time before any silly "super computer" or "5x the power of current day computer processors" references were tossed around. Infact sales fell so sharply the Dreamcast was discontinued not many months after the launch of the PS2 and with Nintendo and Microsoft in the fight as well they left all together.
By your theory of hardware superiority dominating console sales the PS3 should be selling like hotcakes while the Wii/PS2 should be all but finished by now and the Xbox1 should of sold far better. In reality the PS2 is still a huge seller due to its massive game lineup with new games still popping up frequently in the top 20 sales monthly, Xbox 1 wasnt really a success in any sense, the PS3 is selling quite poorly and the wii is taking over the planet. I'd also like to remind you the Xbox360, even in the US, has not to my knowledge broken any of the PS2s sales records despite having a one year unquestionable hardware superiority in the console world.
Its not hardware and flashy demos that sell consoles, especially not to the actual group that makes up most of the userbase who dont buy until they drop 50% of their launch price and live on a budget. It is games and brand recognition first and foremost. Sony had it as a home console platform, Sega didnt.
Looks like the 80GB model will be $499 eventually as well:
http://www.n4g.com/industrynews/News-52240.aspx
Just some analysts view, but makes sense to me.
Just some analysts view, but makes sense to me.