Likely the lower one. Closer to the controls, and closer to the eyes if held at any natural angle. (And would be less susceptible to motion as it's being held.)Guden Oden said:Which of the two screens would you guys say is the more powerful one, the upper or the lower one?
cybamerc said:Why do you assume that one screen has less resources available than the other? It could just as well be up to developer to manage them.
cybamerc said:Touch screen is hardly confirmed.
Secondly, the initial announcement made it pretty damn obvious that NDS would be using 3DM.
cybamerc said:Why do you assume that one screen has less resources available than the other? It could just as well be up to developer to manage them.
cybamerc said:
3DM is Matrix 3D Memory
cybamerc said:No. You're imagining things.
This is already confirmed by Nintendo in their original unveiling of the unit.
Nintendo DS features two separate 3-inch TFT LCD display panels, separate processors, and semiconductor memory of up to 1 Gigabit. It's scheduled to launch worldwide before the end of 2004.
Squeak said:I think the success of NDS hinges on its 3d capabilities.
If it haven’t got at the very least the 3d power of Saturn, I can't see any worthwhile uses for two screens, on the other hand if it does have 3d, there is all sorts of uses, the most important being (IMO of course) that you wouldn’t need to fiddle with a 3d camera, while playing.