pakpassion
Banned
we will wait for Dave has to say about this.
Hardknock said:With the appropriate GameFaqs headline no doubt Klee seems to be good at those.
Check it out:
http://www.ga-forum.com/showthread.php?t=66521
Shogmaster said:KLEE is like the Jerry Springer of X360/PS3 news reporting over at GAF. He must really miss his GameFan days.
Shogmaster said:KLEE is like the Jerry Springer of X360/PS3 news reporting over at GAF. He must really miss his GameFan days.
mckmas8808 said:Wow this is getting crazy. We really do need Dave for this one.
Panajev2001a said:No we DO NOT. Going by ancient definitions for SSI, LSI, VLSI, ULSI as some people were doing here is the problem.
In the industry they indeed use the word LSI as IC or Integrated Circuit before someone using the Wiki starts going nuts.
The likely thing is that the diagram between Xenos and the daughter die is wrong counting only one way bandwidth while you should have separate read and write busses.
pakpassion said:so can you tell in laymans terms whats wrong with the article, the picture and the whole situation.
Acert93 said:If we are taking the slide literally what would we gather from the pair double ended arrows.
Also, does anyone recall the exact read/write bandwidth in the diagrams between the parent and daughter die? I am heading out so I cannot find it right now but maybe that info could be helpful.
pakpassion said:Article Date: June 26th 2005
1) Why would be downgrade after it was taped out?
2) They have already manufactured the graphics card according to the chip picture, that means the info Dave Got is one OF the Graphics card connection, why would they ever reduce bandwidth?
I don't think it's been mentioned, but if we go by the reported CPU frequency we have 2.8 GHz -> 3.2 GHz which is a .875 ratio. If the GPU followed suit the beta kit would have been 437.5 MHz, that multiplied by the 512 bit bus gives you... ~22.4 GB/s.one said:Another possible theory is it's just the figure for beta kit which is synchronized to a lower frequency of GPU, but I don't know the exact clockspeed of Xenon beta kit GPU, does anyone know details about this?
Actually, it would be 350MHz. 350Mhz x 64B = 22.4GB/s. PEACE.chachi said:I don't think it's been mentioned, but if we go by the reported CPU frequency we have 2.8 GHz -> 3.2 GHz which is a .875 ratio. If the GPU followed suit the beta kit would have been 437.5 MHz, that multiplied by the 512 bit bus gives you... ~22.4 GB/s.
Whether that means anything or not, I don't know. I rather doubt they scaled the GPU back since ATI were talking about how easily Xenos went to 90nm and how happy they were with its production and that was what gave them (false, it turned out) confidence about the 520.
MechanizedDeath said:Actually, it would be 350MHz. 350Mhz x 64B = 22.4GB/s. PEACE.
Yeah, I was just about to edit, forgot to divide by 8, d'oh.MechanizedDeath said:Actually, it would be 350MHz. 350Mhz x 64B = 22.4GB/s. PEACE.