Powderkeg said:
The Saturn sold less than 10 million units total, and that is less than half of the Xbox userbase.
And how is the Xbox vs. PS2 sales at all relevent to my comments or points?
I like your last sentence, because it says it all. WHEN COMPARED TO THE PS@.
Well, don't compare it to the PS2. Compare it to MS's console userbase from the previous generation, which was ZERO. Going from ZERO to 22+ million is a success.
Going from 35+ million down to less than 10 million like Sega did was a failure. If you don't see the difference then try removing the ****** sunglasses.
It was a very desirable option that the DC didn't have at all.
Sure it did. Financial strength is what made the Xbox last 4 years and made sure the 360 was a reality. do you think MS would have persued the 360 project if they were in as bad of a financial position as Sega was in 2008? Not a chance.
And there are a million reasons for that, most of which you obviously are ignorant of.
When the Xbox launched it had absolutely no previous userbase. Developers didn't support it because they didn't know how well it would see, and consumers didn't support it because the rumor was Nintendo and Sony would going to flatten them and MS would drop out of the console race.
Clearly neither of those problems exist now. Developers are giving the 360 tons of support (Even giving the 360 new versions of formerly Playstation exclusive titles) and consumers have absolutely no fears about MS staying around or getting good games.
The first year of the PS2 it enjoyed success based off the Playstation. The first 2 years of the Xbox MS had to struggle and fight to make a dent in the market because they were the great unknown.
And I shouldn't have to explain the implications of the 9-11 terrorist attacks only 2 months before the Xbox launch and how that effected consumer confidence and sales.
I'm not saying the Xbox 360 is going to outsell the PS3 by the end of next-gen, but I think even implying the 360 is another Dreamcast is beyond ignorant. It's just plain dumb.
Cuz the xbox 360 is the succesor to a failed console,if sega would had 4 billions to blow on the DC,it would have sold alot more than what the Xbox did,in fact Nintendo make profit out of the GC and sold what 18 or 19 million consoles,which is what 4 million away from the xbox which has alot more suport?
You say from zero to 20 million is a succes with a market so spanded as it is now,the Nes whent from zero to 60+ million the PS whent from zero to 100 million.
As you can see the closes is the Nes and it sold 3 times what the xbox sold,the PS sold 5 times.
MS din't have another console before the Xbox but they are one of the most known companys in this world,and their software is use for gaming on PC which has alot of millions of gamers as well.
Also how is that diferent from what happen to Nintendo?
They sold 60+ millions Nes,down to 50+ Snes does that mean the Snes was a failure?
Wait but the N64 sold like 30+ should we callk it a failure,when it sold 10+ million consoles more than the xbox with less suport cuz it sold less than the Snes?
Seling 22 million consoles with the kind of..
Money MS has invested on the xbox and loss what 4 billions.
With features build in that the other company sold apart HDD.
And with suport from almost every company making game for PS2.
No my friend that is more of and escuse than a fact,the xbox failed to capture a big share of the market vs a console which is older under power and that doesn't have a HDD build in,in fact many people say the GC is a failure cuz it din't sold what the N64 did,yet is close to the xbox and did make profits for Nintendo so how is the GC a failure is beyon logic to me.
The DC din't had it at all but by the time the PS2 was seling great the DC was $150 and then $99 and DVD player where $150 as well,by 2001 any one could buy a DC and a DVD player for far less than what the xbox would have cost you with the remote to see movies,but the fact is you had to buy a remote control,which was a joke cuz the PS2 was free and it wasn't like the xbox could not do it,they just luck it so you have to pay more.
The DC lasted almost 3 year with sega's finalcial problems,there is no reason on this planet why the xbox should not live until 2007,it as the last to the market and it is the first to be kill,but taking away the only factor in which money has serve MS to keep the xbox alive,how did it serve them vs the PS2 did it slow it down did the people reacted better to the xbox than to the PS2 cuz MS has very deep pockets,did it even capture 40% of the market....
Nothing my firend other than keeping the xbox alive and putting some nasty losses on MS deep pockets,is the reason why MS want to leave the xbox on back already,MS din't get to be as it is now blowing 4 billions on every product they make,if they don't see profits with the xbox 360 i think they will not compete again.
In fact what you say about the xbox not having suport is dead wrong,to begin with EA was on board so was alot of developers that say it,from Konami to capcom sega you name it,also what many people were thinking over the net was that MS with it's deep pockets would take the market from Sony hands,Nintendo was not even a problem for MS.
The PS2 make it the first year cuz just like the xbox it had games,is incredible that after so many years poeople still try to put down the PS2,cuz it clean the floor with any one including the great unknow company you claim to be which is not so unknown to begin with.
MS is one of the biggest companys in the wolrd,saying MS is getting into your business mean you have some big trouble.
If you think that MS was unknown when they release the xbox you are the one to need to take your goggles away my friend.
Unproven on the console market like Sony once was yes i give you that,but unknown i don't think so.
Lest see the PS2 had Tekken Tag,which is like the most popular fighting game for a PS console the first game ever to sold a million copys on PS.
Madden 2001 this one i don't even have to speak for it.
SSX which was a fresh new gamewhich also landed like Tekken and Madden great scores.
Compare to DOA 2.5 for the xbox which isn't as popular or as good as Tekken,PGR which was also release for DC by the name of MSR the same year the xbox was launch,in fact it god more hype as a DC game when it was tag as GT killer for months only to fell short by miles even to GT2 which was on PS with horrible graphics compare to MSR.
And Halo which another game of the bunch until MS buy Bugie and hype it as the be all end all of games,which was great but not the be all end all they claimed to be.
And I shouldn't have to explain the implications of the 9-11 terrorist attacks only 2 months before the Xbox launch and how that effected consumer confidence and sales.
I don't wnat to quote like this but this part here deserve it.
That is the worst escuse i had ever hear to justifie xbox low sales,escuse me and correct me if i'm wrong that was the first holiday season for the Xbox and the GC,in that case i would have to say that consumer were selective cuz they did buy the PS2 with confidence yet they din't do the same with the GC and Xbox.
The PS2 sold 3 million units that holiday outseling the xbox and GC combined.
Dude that is realy a bad escuse the PS2 sold extremely well that holiday outseling both combined.
It would have sound better if you say that the Xbox and the Cube landed into GTA3,MGS2 and FFX which was release on december 2001.
We have to see,the graphical advatage was one of the xbox key features,so was the HDD and but has gone away.