You should take a look at The Thick of It, if you haven't already.
Interesting ... Some of the actors and even some of the characters seem to be shared between the movie and the series, but not in a one to one overlap it seems. One actor plays the same character, while another actor plays in both but a different role it seems.
Thanks for the tip, may check it out.
As for Transformers, I like spectacle, but thought Transformers 2 was a bit too much here and there - it didn't manage to be something coherent as well as 1. If AlStrong says 3 is a return to form that's good enough for me and I will see it, though not necessarily in the cinema (I am a big fan of 3D though and who knows). Oh and yes my wife likes them too (at least the first).
Comparing it to Avatar, which is also a spectacle movie but less noisily so, and there the highs stand out higher, but the lows of Avatar are very low. In our case, anything involving the army doesn't really hold up to repeat viewing ... but my wife will watch the bits where he ends up in 'nature' for the first time each time it appears on one of the movie channels we have. The Lord of the Rings is similar - the good parts are really great, but almost any part that involves Sam and Frodo only make me sick. They are just too overly melodramatic. I have to reread the books to see whether it was really that bad in the original
but the actors and way of shooting lays it on extra thick. I got tired of it during the first view already. Because of it, only the first movie for me is a rewatcheable classic from start to finish.
Haven't seen the new Harry Potter yet - haven't seen nearly any of them in the cinema, inviting my wife to take some potter fan with her instead. Generally they've been pretty good, though some parts I thought were stretching themselves a little thin. My wife wants to see the new one in 3D, just to give some counter balance to people negative on 3D.
We both love 3D.
I rewatched Shrek Forever After on the movie channel the other day, and really missed the 3D there (had seen it in 3D in the cinema). While the movie holds up, 3D really added something meaningful there, like conveying points of view and emotion. Whoever was in charge of that movie's camera work is brilliant and I hope that 3D takes off, just so that guy can eventually take his important place in the history of its success.