I thought that there could be some partnership with Facebook. Also Facebook has neat VR tech which can become compatible with XSX/XSS too.Although not a streaming media service, when Microsoft sold mixer to Facebook they announced a partnership with Facebook Gaming, which would allow someone to stream Xcloud games on the Facebook website if I understand it correctly. Thinking about it, if the partnership with Facebook is deeper than it outwardly appears the Facebook portal devices could make a very interesting Xcloud endpoint, a built-in screen, ubiquitous hardware, dual-purpose with the video chat functionality. You can even use Alexa on the portal devices so Facebook doesn't seem to mind partnering with the 'competition'. Could be a big seller. I wonder how much mixer sold for?
Article about selling mixer and xcloud
https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/22/...g-facebook-gaming-partnership-xcloud-features
facebook portal devices
https://portal.facebook.com/
huh I didn't know that, I wonder how much those partnerships went for?To be clear... Microsoft did not sell Mixer. Microsoft still owns all the Mixer technology. Microsoft sold the partnerships of people who used Mixer to stream. That is what Facebook bought.
I thought that there could be some partnership with Facebook. Also Facebook has neat VR tech which can become compatible with XSX/XSS too.
I mean Microsoft these days partners with a lot of companies that work in areas similar to Amazon. As it could not compete with Amazon's Twitch it went to Facebook. As it does not have space tech it went to SpaceX. To deal with EGS and Tencent, they will probably go after Valve.Amazon has Amazon Prime, MS doesn't have any so maybe some deal is possible with Netflix or Disney+. Microsoft is building coalitions.
I wonder if we can build euler diagrams to find some possible future partnerships.
Still Amazon is the future uber corporation.
I think partnership with Disney+ would be better due to sheer amount of IPs Disney has that can be turned into games. Though Disney rents their IPs to various companies these days - SE, EA, Sony. Disney has good some ties with EA, and EA is closer to MS though.Yeah they do partner with lots of people, I think it would be a good idea to partner with Netflix for shows based on Microsoft IP, Netflix and the Netflix of gaming teaming up
I think that is because unlike other cloud providers - MS has the most experience with running gaming cloud - after all they created Xbox Live. AWS seems to be better in video service streaming - considering that Netflix and Disney+ use them for their streaming services. The problem with MS for now is server coverage - AWS has much bigger amount of regions.you already see this a bit with sony partnering with Microsoft for something PlayStation related with azure
Oh for sure, partnership with some TV streaming service would be very good for Microsoft. I still believe that Disney+ is the best it has recognizable brands. Then again Netflix it seems to be kinda successful with TV series based on games.
- Partnering with a streaming service would be a good idea, get some more eyes on their gaming IP, whether that's Netflix, Disney +, HBO max, whoever. The streaming service and xbox work together to get a show about a game out at the same time make a lot of marketing synergies, things like Netflix's Witcher show would be perfect.
Spiderman is bigger than Batman + unlike Batman it has a very popular game like Spiderman on PS. Associating PS with Spiderman will give great benefits to Sony and might entice Disney to ask Sony to develop more games.
- I think Microsoft need one or two 'Everyman IPs' like sony has with spiderman, there is no one as big or recognisable right now, I suppose batman is in the same order of magnitude, but not close.
- I wonder if Disney would be willing to sell the game rights to star wars? would be a hefty price but could be worth it. Especially with Disney hurting financially at the moment. Interestingly Disney already partners with Microsoft on investigating moving movie production to the cloud, (link below) could be an inroad to a deeper partnership. Microsoft could offer them a good deal on Azure for hosting Disney + to sweeten the pot.
I thought about that, but I wonder how it's gonna work out in the end. Microsoft learnt from their mistakes and do not try to become a monopoly and buy everybody and everything.With amazon I cant help think (and be optimistic really) that regulators are going to start reigning them in a bit, they have a few too many fingers in a few too many industry destroying pies imo.
except look at amazon.If you took at the acquisitions of Amazon, Apple and Google, they've only ever acquired companies for technology, not for the people, nor non-technology patent IP. If they want in on gaming they will be able to recruit good talent by being able to pay more.
Because of Microsoft's position in the market, they pretty much have the field to themselves. If Sony have wanted to buy Bethesda, I doubt they would have been able to being console market leader.
I don't think sony could have purchased bethesda it would be to large of a purchase for them
Not accurate at all.
Not accurate at all.
Sony tried to but walked away. They were in early talks, which started the entire thing, but they walked away somewhere around the $2 Bilion region.
At least thats what all the industry had been saying many months before the MS announcement.
It was actually 4.8B and Sony saw another opportunity (WB) they're still working on from what I know.
Ah, I hadn't heard the WB turning their head. I guess its just like the Distracted Boyfriend meme.
Man, that would really hurt Microsoft if Sony got all the superhero games. I wonder if Microsoft might take another punt at WB?Yeah. From what I'm hearing, Sony wants to secure all the rights for publishing the DC universe (just for gaming, not films, nor television). If they can do it, that would be a huge score for them.
It was actually 4.8B and Sony saw another opportunity (WB) they're still working on from what I know.
Don't worry microsoft is there too along with another really big company.
I'm just pointing out that the WB stuff hasn't gone away , its not just sony trying to get rights to DC. There are multiple big companies including one that is bigger than Microsoft from what I've heard.This isn't a dick wagging competition, or console warrior chest pounding. These companies are simply doing what they do best... compete.
Spiderman is bigger than Batman + unlike Batman it has a very popular game like Spiderman on PS. Associating PS with Spiderman will give great benefits to Sony and might entice Disney to ask Sony to develop more games.
Batman with all its games is not even comparable. And Avengers brand got hurt by the recent game. DC brand is kinda niche or something.
I don't believe Disney will sell the rights. But EA is doing fine with Star Wars rights and EA is close to MS.
.
I'm just pointing out that the WB stuff hasn't gone away , its not just sony trying to get rights to DC. There are multiple big companies including one that is bigger than Microsoft from what I've heard.
I'm just pointing out that the WB stuff hasn't gone away , its not just sony trying to get rights to DC. There are multiple big companies including one that is bigger than Microsoft from what I've heard.
It's not always about $$$... but also prior relationships and potential future partnerships. One of the reason why AT&T sold Crunchyroll for under a billion to Sony, rather than 1.3B Tencent was offering and the 1.5B AT&T was originally seeking. Plus, Sony has a great relationship with many of the WB gaming studio exe's and developers. That being said, of course Microsoft is probably whispering in AT&T/WB ears as well... I know I would if I knew my competition was doing the same.