“There’s no one asking us to do anything,” she continued. “World of Warcraft is doing very well and they’re very proud of what it’s been able to accomplish, so it’s almost like just let it be, and let it keep being awesome. They’ve been tremendously supportive and it’s like ‘let Blizzard be Blizzard’.”
Is letting Blizzard being Blizzard really such a great thing lately ? I have no definitive answer but it's surely not a big yes without hesitations.
We have at least a couple of anecdotes of execs at ABK outside of the game teams themselves enforcing stupid decisions. So probably.
That works great when you're activision which did nothing but re-print same games over and over and over again. If you want innovative new IPs that mentality won't work in a company that has big cash cow titles too.Overwatch 2's PvE content scrapped as devs are denied bonuses for the first time, report claims
Overwatch 2's beleaguered PvE content has reportedly been scrapped.www.eurogamer.netBlizzard had always shared bonuses company-wide to avoid "everyone [wanting] to work on the most successful games rather than experiment with new ideas", but former Activision boss, Bobby Kotich, had long argued that only those "behind the most lucrative products should be rewarded".
Following the unexpected move to shut down three game studios and merge another with ZeniMax Online, we learned that Microsoft is still planning more cuts to its Xbox division. But that's not the full extent of the company's re-evaluation of its gaming strategy.
According to The Verge's Tom Warren, Microsoft is still pondering whether to put Call of Duty on Game Pass. Call of Duty is a big driver of Activision Blizzard's revenue, after all, and there are concerns that adding the games to the subscription service could reduce that revenue as players stop purchasing Call of Duty at full price to get it on Game Pass.
...
Anyway, Tom Warren also heard Microsoft might be looking to increase the price of Game Pass Ultimate (again - it already did so less than a year ago, though the United States were unaffected), although it's not certain that will happen.
To promote the GP product, gain MAUs to draw gamers to additional products available there.If it's F2P, why does it need to go on GP?
This, I believe, is a sure bet. Warzone perks in the form of some skins or whatever the Warzone MacGuffin is will undoubtably be a GP Ultimate perk.For Mighty Doom (rip), they added some perks in the free game if you linked it to a gamepass enabled account
But those GP subscribers (and non subscribers) can get the game elsewhere. You mean as a sort of smoke-and-mirrors thing??To promote the GP product, gain MAUs to draw gamers to additional products available there.
Yeah I guess it doesn't really make sense unless it's only available on GP. No one who might be interested in Warzone would choose to use GP for it if they don't have GP already.But those GP subscribers (and non subscribers) can get the game elsewhere. You mean as a sort of smoke-and-mirrors thing??
i couldn't get into mighty doom. It just wasn't goodFor Mighty Doom (rip), they added some perks in the free game if you linked it to a gamepass enabled account
No, it's just a completely unfounded rumour from nowhere.Another chapter of Microsoft buys stuff
No, it's just a completely unfounded rumour from nowhere.