One thing a lot of people fail to realize about the difference between MGS2 and Shenmue is the difference in FRAMERATE. Shenmue runs at 30 fps (with draw-in, clipping, slowdown) while MGS2 runs at a crisp 60 fps even while on the tanker w/ all the effects going on at the same time.
1. Shenmue doesn't have clipping not to mention HUGE draw distance ie Dock level.
2. The NPCs fade in/out they don't clip and it's only when there are many of them onscreen.
3. The slowdown is few and far between, again only when there are many NPCs (who have their own mini lives).
4. Shenmue runs in Progressive.
Not too bad for a game running on older underpowered hardware
yeah? They're probably biased trolls like you. Only the most ardent PS2 hating people think that MGS2 is unimpressive graphically.
Funny how it's when you get owned you suddenly start saying "oh it's just an opinion" - you were fighting pretty hard against other people's opinions in this thread.
Actually if you go back and read the first two pages of the thread, it's obvious that most of the MGS2 supporters can't accept NO for an awswer, or an opinion for that matter, and even resorting to (not surprisingly) using Shenmue running on older underpowered hardware...genius.
The only people who had no clue that it was clearly opinion from the beginning was the MGS2 zealots, hence the need for declaration. You unfortunatel however are late to the party and have no clue whatsoever