Intel Gen 11 Graphics Architecture

seems like Vega

 

With 1/3th the performance of the Radeon Pro Vega 20 and 1/12th (8%) of the Radeon RX Vega 64.

 

The number against Radeon Pro Vega 20 is wrong (should be 1/3).
But yes it obviously doesn't compete with that - however on paper it pretty much corresponds to a Vega 8 (with same tflops / clock) (whereas the current GT2 is close to Vega 3 there). Now of course if in practice it will perform similar remains to be seen (the current GT2 isn't too far off from Vega 3, though Gen11 will need improvements in bandwidth efficiency if it wants to keep up against Vega 8 - and of course AMD should have something newer out by then).

 

Acknowledged.

No doubt Teraflop-scale processing power is a milestone for Intel, but that's been available on low-end AMD Radeon Rx x50/x60 discrete graphics from 5+ years ago - which also have 100 GByte/s dedicated GDDR5 memory.

 

Intel's IGP never really were area-efficient compared to the competition as far as I can tell, so it's not surprising to see improvement there. And I bet they improved power-efficiency, which was subpar too, along with it (that is, power efficiency with 3d load - power management seemed great, as well as efficiency of video decode and display blocks).
I am curious though if these improvements were really first realized with Gen 11, or not already Gen 10 (could of course be partly Gen 10, partly Gen 11). But of course nowadays intel won't even acknowledge Gen 10 exists, even though yesterdays tune was that the chips which actually have Gen 10 graphics are in great shape and shipping in volume since a year .
Although it's quite possible Gen 11 is the bigger improvement than Gen 10 would have been (after all the GT2 GPU on Cannonlake increased EUs only to 40).