Yep, N6 is 7"nm" family, N5 5"nm" family
Intel ARC GPUs, Xe Architecture for dGPUs [2018-2022]
- Thread starter DavidGraham
- Start date
-
- Tags
- intel
- Status
Bondrewd
Veteran
Yea.
Flappy Pannus
Veteran
Confirmed.
Arstechnica said:
So what I expected. However I'm only 'correct' in the most pedantic technical way:
Arstechnica said:
That's an extremely meagre upsell hike for 8 more gigs, and you get a bit more bandwidth boost too. The 8GB model really doesn't make that much sense to get by comparison, so this is clearly the model Intel wants to put out there as the basis for reviews imo.
Arstechnica said:
Full specs below. 512 GB/sec for under $300 is pretty awesome. Hell they're even maintaining that with the A5, although no price details yet.
Hope to eventually dispose of the 'if the drivers don't suck' disclaimer sometime in the near future though, but alas.
As for performance, with Intel's own slide against against a 3060, it's pretty simple to extrapolate vs a 770 considering the small uplift in specs over a 750 in the chart. So the LE 770 will definitely not compete with the 3060ti anytime soon, and likely still fall below the 3060 in DX11 titles. So give and take, not going to significantly shake up the market at this point but if they can truly offer it at the MSRP and get the drivers in order it has a chance. Pretty significant 'if's' though.
Last edited:
RTX 40 supports AV1 encoding and decoding in hardware, just like Arc, and RDNA3 has been confirmed (Linux patches) to support both too.
Oh, sorry.
But who cares about 'Screamers'
(typo intended, this time)
Its good for future proofing and creators etc.
Techpowerup's site implies the A770 in its 8GB variant should be around 20% faster than my current 2080Ti. 16GB version has double the memory and additional 50gb/s or so more. TDP of just 225watts?
Intel Arc A770 Specs
Intel DG2-512, 2400 MHz, 4096 Cores, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, 16384 MB GDDR6, 2000 MHz, 256 bit
Spec wise your getting 3080 performance in raw raster with 16GB vram, with what kind of RT/ML performance? Seems a very good price, extremely good lol.
It's probably going to be something like a 2070. In games that run well on it at least.
Last edited:
Then Intel truly has to improve their drivers/optimization.
They are all about comparing it to a 3060 and a 2070 is similar to that.
They're also comparing A750 to 3060 and it's beating it on average in DX12/Vulkan
There's virtually no chance any of these GPUs is competing with a 2080 Ti. Their best SKUs are on the level of the 3060/2070.
DavidGraham
Veteran
The only reason to buy this GPU is for the novelty sake, other than that you are buying subpar DX11 performance, emulated DX10/DX9/DX8 games with all the bugs and performance issues associated with emulation, and non existent support for anything older than DX8.
OpenGL games are a toss up in the air, drivers features too, bugs, artifacts are rampant, and worst of all, unreliable history and future, as the fate of this whole Intel endeavor is under threat of ending, and then your card could be nothing more than paperweight.
I admit I didn't actually count the difference and see if it's really faster on average, but if it isn't it's close.
- Status
