I agree there's nothing conclusive, but the little evidence there is of instalment-based gaming being a meaningful launch feature of XBSX is against the notion.
No we don't. The theory on the table is that MS will launch the console with a sub-based package expecting to shift a lot of boxes (as I understand it). That's the theory that needs evidence to prove it.Umm. LOL I think Microsoft has enough internal data to make their own informed decisions. We personally need more data to say it's "against the notion".
I'm not against it. How can you say that when I've acknowledged anything can happen? I'm arguing that there isn't a good argument for the idea of MS backing this move from launch, not that it isn't a good idea.I get it you're against it,
At the end of the console's life cycle again. And the data for 360 may have been terrible, but the cost of impleneting this is minimal at the end of a generation so no reason not to. That's very different to basing your launch sales strategy and pricing on a sub-based option though.BTW, the 360 program must have had some interesting numbers for them to do it a 2nd time, no?
Microsoft: "With 12TF games will be barely better than current generation, but you know, anyway higher framerate, a little higher resolution..."
Sony: "Look at this generational leap"
This is ho to sell a next generation console.
When/where did Microsoft say this? Was this in the event last week that I've not caught yet?Microsoft: "With 12TF games will be barely better than current generation, but you know, anyway higher framerate, a little higher resolution..."
It's what they communicated, and what was written in the articles following the stream
slooooooooooow!How to sell a next-gen console?
It's like this:
This is the downside of ms strategy.
Timezones? Sony execs are asleep?It’s clear that this is a big win for Sony - just look at any social media but especially Twitter.
And yet, they’re still completely silent! Incredible.
This reminds me of the 1X, most powerful console. But 1P especially looked a lot better in most people's eyes on PS4 /Pro and 3P usually close enough.That means their next-gen marketing is going to look decidedly current-gen if they are waiting until 2021/2022 to produce next-gen titles with next-gen engines. If Sony have just a couple of next-gen titles from in-house engines for launch, they'll have a way better image as a next-gen machine than MS if MS don't put out some 'visualisations'. Having the more powerful machine won't do MS any favours if they have the software to showcase it.
I hope so, they'd only say something stupid.Timezones? Sony execs are asleep?