PC-Engine said:
You actually think I would be stupid enough to contradict myself?
Actually no, I didn't think you would be stupid enough to contradict yourself but apparently I was wrong.
PC-Engine said:
You fell right for the bait hook, line, and sinker Sherlock. There's nothing special about a PC emulating a calculator with graphing functions.
Exactly. There is nothing special about a PC emulating a calculator with graphing functions. Heck, there is little special about
emulating a calculator in the first place. It's novel, yes. Interesting, uh, ok. Only to nerds I guess. Cool? Uh, seek help.
PC-Engine said:
The cleverness/uniqueness comes from emulating the calculator with a portable that has one screen for the graphing functions and another touch screen for the virtual buttons.
Naw, the uniqueness comes from emulating a calculator in the first place. Definately wins points for uniqueness but a calculator? Talk about the opposite of cool.
PC-Engine said:
Apparently you dug yourself into a hole that you can't climb out of, scrambling for examples to only come up with PC emulation that uses a boring mouse and stupid computer monitor to emulate a calculator....LMAO. Do you see anybody carrying around a PC as a calculator? You're hopeless.
Dude,
all of us have pretty much buried you under your own words. Besides, it's not as if you couldn't DL a calculator for PDAs years ago. Whoa, a Scientific Calculator. You must get all the chicks!
PC-Engine said:
It's called TI-85 emulation for a reason Sherlock. Maybe you'd rather it be called TI-2010?
Ah yes. Too bad TI-85s suck compared to HPs. Let's emulate something that sucks. Ok.
PC-Engine said:
Actually an Abacus using the touch screen would be pretty cool and unique.
You know, I actually wrote Abacus at first but didn't think it was nerdy enough for my point.
PC-Engine said:
The situation cannot be reversed because PSP doesn't have touch screen so the IF doesn't even apply here. You didn't see me using IFs did you? You know why?
It's called a hypothetical situation. And actually the question was rhetorical because we ALL know the answer to my question.
PC-Engine said:
Why would it need to when it already wins in the cleverness/uniqueness category? Console emulation is
OLD NEWS get it?
Yay! Welcome to the new age of gaming gentlemen. "We've secretly replaced your favorite consoles with a Calculator!"
PC-Engine said:
LMAO...you're hopeless man.
PC-Engine against the world, again. I never get tired of it. Pure comedy gold!
PC-Engine said:
That's just stupid man. Adding on various MODULES to do emulation of a remote control is just DUMB. That's just missing the whole point of emulation and bordering on stupid since a DS would only be a single part of the whole emulation system.
So now the DS has to be the COMPLETE system? Interesting standard. Here I was suggesting expanding the interface but you'd rather limit yourself. /shrug - to each his own.
PC-Engine said:
Actually I said it was clever which it is and it's also unique. Clever is cool in my book.
I can agree with this.
PC-Engine said:
Trolling, what was I trolling about?
When you first asked about where the TG-16 came into all of this. Then you went on a rant about the PSP.
Lazy8s said:
That's not a new thing. The MBX Lite powered Dell Axim x50v has been running emulators like PocketSNES.
And is getting a scientific calculator on a hand held (a PDA like you used in your example) something new? In fact, I'd wager this type of software existed on PDAs before emulation of consoles.