I don't see an issue with it? Write out formal terms on how this would work?Can I get in on this, on DSoup side? IE if DSoup (and me) looses then I will kick in the same amount he donates to B3D, up to 100 USD.
So what if MS opens up with Phil Spencer and Drake in Master Chief costumes performing "Controlla" and "Hotline Bling"? Should the stop watch start before or after that opening?
I concur with that, that the '5 minute' mark should be 5 minutes of meat excluding any preamble. The first real item will either be sales/usage related, or talk of XBox One games or services, or Windows 10 talk including UWP, or a Scorpio reveal, or something new like a new handheld.
True, but S was not a product they laboured on. They moved onto Gears immediately after - and yeah, the whole announcement literally was seconds. This won't be the case with Scorpio. Scorpio is likely going to be the climax of the conference. And a climax can go on and on. Just ask Sting.Except for last year. Phil announced Xbox One S in less than 3 minutes & that was with an opening video.
I can understand climax but what's to labor on about? They already got the specs out already.
This is exactly my point. They will not open with Scorpio. But the modified wager is unworkable in that they'll never be agreement on what constitutes preamble or opening or "meat". In Sony conferences the opening preamble can go on for fifteen minutes where they talk about everything and nothing while everybody falls asleep.
Rangers' wager appealed because it is an incontrovertible test. I'm still happy to take Ranger's wager if he is - or other's are but nothing subjective. I just can't be arsed with all the arguing and whinging that goes with any subjective discussion on these forums.
Already what Rangers wagered is being backtracked as people realise five minutes is not a lot of time and Phil Spencer will likely spend several minutes thanking the audience, asking if they have a good time etc. You know why I know this? Because I looked at previous Xbox conferences before accepting the wager.
I can understand climax but what's to labor on about? They already got the specs out already. They already got the "fastest console ever" announcement out of the way. They can basically put up a picture of the console with name, price & release date then drop the mic & then continue talking about the games. Like I said before they could do it first or last. However after thinking about it more I'm leaning more to first since the games will be the core message & not the hardware. I'm sure they want everyone to know that they have lots of first party & second party games since the slower hardware narrative can just fade away.
Tommy McClain
In his defence, I think '5 minutes' was nothing more than off the cuff for "it's queued up as the first major piece". If you're wagering on his mistake of language, you can see why he's not fully being a sport about it.
I'm not sure how you want to proceed on this front, you seem fairly positive that you're expecting Scorpio at the end of the presentation.
I could see this going both ways.
I fully agree. If this were Sony, who are fairly predictable, they'd do all the routine stuff, new games coming to the platform, then the final half/third would be focussed on the new hardware. Tailed with a quick recap at the end, game reels etc, then close.
I'm not sure how else to interpret this, I mean, towards the end is certainly not near the beginning, or just after the preamble.Um, no. I don't believe that nor said anything like that. Are we reading the same forum?!? :-/
No way, they'll leave it towards the end to keep people tuned in. Climaxing early in anything is bad.
Firstly DF articles don't result in high traffic on Eurogamer so there will be plenty of people who don't know about the specifications and of those that do, even fewer will understand them. I'm expecting they will be showcasing what Scorpio can do that One can't. I anticipate a good 20-30 minutes on Microsoft's new Xbox.
That's quite a bit of time and focus for what according to you interests only "thin slither of gamers".
I'm not sure how else to interpret this, I mean, towards the end is certainly not near the beginning, or just after the preamble.
#583