Oh I didn't remember it being that long.The legal agreement is for the next 10 years. It means the last four years of PS5 and the first 6 years of PS6. COD will be exclusive to Xbox and PC from 2034.
Oh I didn't remember it being that long.The legal agreement is for the next 10 years. It means the last four years of PS5 and the first 6 years of PS6. COD will be exclusive to Xbox and PC from 2034.
If there isn't a next gen console from competitors what is the violation ? If MS releases on the ps5 / ps5 pro / switch 2/ xbox series / xbox next is it MS's fault if there is no ps6 out ? Would it be MS's fault if as Sony stated in the merger hearings that they wouldn't provide ps6 dev kits prior to launch because MS might use that information in their own unit.Wouldn't that be a violation of the agreements made for the merger? Spencer promised 100% parity across platforms and no intention to use COD to sell XBoxes. Though I don't know what was enshrined in the various legal agreements versus non-binding Tweets!
Of course there wouldn't be a problem if PS6 isn't out, but that part was missing from your proposal. Had you said "before Sony gets the PS6 out" I'd have better understood your position.If there isn't a next gen console from competitors what is the violation ? If MS releases on the ps5 / ps5 pro / switch 2/ xbox series / xbox next is it MS's fault if there is no ps6 out ?
They should do a horror themed one and call it Call of Duty: Ghosts. Oh, wait.Call of Duty has done WWII, the cold war, contemporary warfare, the near future (Advanced Warfare) and future (Infinite Warfare). How many times can you reskin weapons, locations and vehicles and call it a "new" game. MW III was utterly shameless but what can do with a shooter creatively?
I think the only thing we know about Phil is what we can garner from his actions and statements. What we garner is that he’s a certified liar and he’s mostly incompetent. As to whether he would make a new game to breach their legal agreement? We can’t say with any certainty. However, seeing as he speaks out of both sides of his mouth and tells more lies than your average politician, I wouldn’t entirely rule it out.Meh. MS can just make new game called Duty Calls. They can tie Sony up in litigation for years. Lol.
They won't though. Not Phil's style.
So far – as far as I am aware – Microsoft have honoured all of their contractual commitments with Xbox. And Phil may be the literal son of Satan, but he still needs to get sign off from the rest of Microsoft.I think the only thing we know about Phil is what we can garner from his actions and statements. What we garner is that he’s a certified liar and he’s mostly incompetent. As to whether he would make a new game to breach their legal agreement? We can’t say with any certainty. However, seeing as he speaks out of both sides of his mouth and tells more lies than your average politician, I wouldn’t entirely rule it out.
What we garner is that he’s a certified liar
Discussions like these help me grow my ignore list, which I consider as my 'batshit crazy filter'.What a bizarre take on Spencer. Who actually thinks that?
I don't understand the thinking there and without actual links to reasonable evidence, I consider it slander! However, a Google shows the sentiment is common. I'd rather see references to lies rather than just the sentiment being thrown out there like it's common general knowledge. Although that's also not a technical discussion for a technical forum.What a bizarre take on Spencer. Who actually thinks that?
Libel! Which is stupider.I don't understand the thinking there and without actual links to reasonable evidence, I consider it slander!
As a general rule libel coves defamation that is written and slander covers defamation that is spoken, but the actual legal definition leans into whether the expression is permanent or temporary. So it's actually the tangibility that matters, i.e. libel deals with statements that are recorded, and slander deals with statements that are transitory and non-permanent.Are things typed on the internet libel as written or slander as said, just digitally?
What if you are one of these people who have to speak every word while they are typing?As a general rule libel coves defamation that is written and slander covers defamation that is spoken, but the actual legal definition leans into whether the expression is permanent or temporary. So it's actually the tangibility that matters, i.e. libel deals with statements that are recorded, and slander deals with statements that are transitory and non-permanent.
Then I guess if somebody is in earshot to take offence then it is both? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯What if you are one of these people who have to speak every word while they are typing?
If Sony is launching a ps5 pro in 2024/2025 as rumors suggest then I doubt a ps6 would come in 2026Of course there wouldn't be a problem if PS6 isn't out, but that part was missing from your proposal. Had you said "before Sony gets the PS6 out" I'd have better understood your position.
You need substantially better tech for a proper new gen and most importantly much smaller node (which won't be the case even for a 2024 launch).As a consumer, I don't see the appeal of mid gen refresh. A new gen = back to the drawing board and putting good future looking hardware together.
Mid gen = boosted specs of what you have and a further delay to a new gen with all it's benefits.
As a consumer, I don't see the appeal of mid gen refresh. A new gen = back to the drawing board and putting good future looking hardware together.
Mid gen = boosted specs of what you have and a further delay to a new gen with all it's benefits.