Sorry Shifty, I believe you truncated the rude/leading part of the statement (not question mark): "if GI would be in GeOW3 he will wrote 2 pages about it 
"
In the context of the flow of discussion the UNSUBSTANTIATED dismissal of a media source as biased/showing preferential platform treatment and comments like that are far out of place and the statement, proposing that GI may be limited to 2 titles, is BS and not appropriate to the spirit of these forums. As a former mod to a mod
And yes, I do find it extremely irritating that, when a non-affiliated party with no apparent horse in the race, gets unfairly marginalized as standard behavior. It is unprofessional and doesn't extend good will to developers or industry insiders--the best features of B3D's community.
As a DF thread I feel the above criticism is completely inline with this thread as well: At what point did it become clear that gamemaster (Richard) is showing the sort of bias that fairly generates the sort of digs and snide remarks in this thread?
I honestly don't read most of this articles (maybe 6 or 7, and his vids play poorly on my system) so maybe I am missing something? But based on his knowledge base and how much is disclosed to him, he seems a fairly objective observer with his own background/criteria for breaking down images.
Or is he a MS shill in disguise as some of the posts here indicate?
Ps- And I could be wrong, because BF3 is the first title I remember going to their sight, Lensoftruth has the reputation like a N4G "click spamming" but even then, if they are producing valid data sets to evaluate and offset with further information (e.g. filtering out where they may not have been very objected) it doesn't matter unless they have doctored data or been overtly misleading in their analysis in the past (in which case they should be a non-discussion worthy site here).
"In the context of the flow of discussion the UNSUBSTANTIATED dismissal of a media source as biased/showing preferential platform treatment and comments like that are far out of place and the statement, proposing that GI may be limited to 2 titles, is BS and not appropriate to the spirit of these forums. As a former mod to a mod
And yes, I do find it extremely irritating that, when a non-affiliated party with no apparent horse in the race, gets unfairly marginalized as standard behavior. It is unprofessional and doesn't extend good will to developers or industry insiders--the best features of B3D's community.
As a DF thread I feel the above criticism is completely inline with this thread as well: At what point did it become clear that gamemaster (Richard) is showing the sort of bias that fairly generates the sort of digs and snide remarks in this thread?
I honestly don't read most of this articles (maybe 6 or 7, and his vids play poorly on my system) so maybe I am missing something? But based on his knowledge base and how much is disclosed to him, he seems a fairly objective observer with his own background/criteria for breaking down images.
Or is he a MS shill in disguise as some of the posts here indicate?
Ps- And I could be wrong, because BF3 is the first title I remember going to their sight, Lensoftruth has the reputation like a N4G "click spamming" but even then, if they are producing valid data sets to evaluate and offset with further information (e.g. filtering out where they may not have been very objected) it doesn't matter unless they have doctored data or been overtly misleading in their analysis in the past (in which case they should be a non-discussion worthy site here).
