It is the same or worse on PS5, I find it funny. For sure Tom Warren comment is valid but the game will probably look much better in 2021.
Hmm at first i thought maybe my cpu was not up to par but you have a 3900x and see the same drops. Im thinking this just needs more patches. If i remember correctly Witcher 3 got patches every month for like 5 months when it launched
How is the framerate?I put three-to-four hours in on PS5 yesterday, starting as nomad which throws you into a massive open landscape from the out. Apart from some weird middle-distance LOD issues which existed only in the desert - so perhaps a buggy heat haze effect, I've only encountered two bugs.
The first was in the desert and was a guy sitting in an invisible car, only the car wasn't just invisible is wasn't there at all because I managed to clip him with my car which the game interpreted as a hit and run, which initiates a police report. The second was a bit of UI that failed to fade away. Fortunately, the game autosaves a lot and I was able to reload from a point a couple of minutes earlier and the UI reverted back to normal.
I'm still learning the game and the mechanics, the majority of which will be familiar to anybody who has played video games before. I expected the UI and menu to be Mass Effect-level bad but it's not. It's not great either, and there it literally no explanation for a lot of stuff but if you can't work out the UI and menus, you're going to struggle with an RPG period,
Because of the technical state of the game I went in with super-low expectations and I've been pleasantly surprised. I've only done a few early missions, including the one demo'd at 2018 Gamescom where you rescue a woman from an apartment. Driving is fine (not great), gunplay is pretty good as far as I'm concerned. Putting aside the core graphics - the visual presentation of the game, such as your UI which includes various info from your cyberware implants and the way you interact with the world, feels super good and fluid.
On PS5? Pretty close to 60 on most places.How is the framerate?
There is something wrong with the Series X picture here - it's way too bright. I just went through this same sequence on PS5.It is the same or worse on PS5, I find it funny. For sure Tom Warren comment is valid but the game will probably look much better in 2021.
doubt it, first mmission you drive car by yourself in the city and certainly drops are there and not minor oneOn PS5? Pretty close to 60 on most places.
doubt it, first mmission you drive car by yourself in the city and certainly drops are there and not minor one
if the 3090 is running at 4K and the PS5 can be locked to 1080P then the PS5 might have even better graphics or frame rate.
Neither does the PS5 pack 6800XT/3080 rasterization level capability. Even rasterization power matters alot in this game seeing the benches with RT/DLSS off. In valhalla, the PS5 seems close/abit faster to 5700XT (amd optimized game). In pure rasterization, one gets an idea.
I think there is hope for ps5 version. CP2077 is very pretty to begin with and there is really good mix of ray tracing settings. Maybe they can come up with good optimizations and a hw specific compromise. But yeah, it's not going to match high end pc unless pc gets that much faster also.
Then I showed him the PC version. And he's now going to get a gaming PC for the first time in his life.
If he really thinks that game is top 5 PS4 then he has not played God of War, the last of us 2, Spider-Man, horizon, The Order, RDR2, Death Stranding, Ghost of Tsushima, Final Fantasy, just to name a few.
As those games would make Witcher 3 a top 10 game, at best.
The Witcher 3 has weird character proportions, movement, as well as animations. The colors especially look very cartoony.
if the 3090 is running at 4K and the PS5 can be locked to 1080P then the PS5 might have even better graphics or frame rate.
I forgot about DLSS. I understand it does not scale like this but, if your 2070 S can run the game with everything at ultra around 4fps, then lowering the resolution by 4 times could produce 16fps, probably higher, correct?
I expect the PS5 to be more powerful than your 2070S, no offense to your rig just stating facts.
the 3090 might cost 4 times as much as an entire PS5, it’s actual performance is not even twice that.
Without RT and DLSS; PS5 should run the exact same settings at 1440p as 3090 4K.
Below 1440p you should see higher frame rates. Again, not taking into account RT or DLSS. With RT enabled PS5 would need to drop to 1080P to produce the same quality of graphics but with higher FPS.
DLSS might be the game changer though, I don’t expect the consoles to have their alternative ready when the PS5, Series X upgrade drops.
1080p and 30fps
he PS5 is unlikely to be able to achieve 30fps at 1080p at the PC's full Ultra level settings. I expect some settings compromises and a higher resolution target as seems to be the trend at the moment.
based on that, there are no grounds for expecting the PS5 to out perform a 2070S in RT workloads.
lower level fast ps5 api should do work on cpu sideEdit: this game is a cpu taxing monster, low resolutions to chase higher FPS, the CPU might get a real workout. Even 3700x's do, at 3.5ghz the ps5 cpu will be hammered?
https://videocardz.com/newz/cyberpu...orce-rtx-30-and-radeon-rx-6000-graphics-cards
It is the same or worse on PS5, I find it funny. For sure Tom Warren comment is valid but the game will probably look much better in 2021.
lower level fast ps5 api should do work on cpu side
lower level fast ps5 api should do work on cpu side
So you're saying that the PS5 without RT and at a much lower resolution can match the 3090 with RT and at a much higher resolution (with DLSS)? I'm not sure what the point of such a comparison is however based on these benchmarks, the 3090 would still be faster:
5700XT @1440p Ultra (No RT) - 38.1fps
3090 @ 4K DLSS Performance with Ultra RT - 54.8fps
They've already stated there will be an upgrade for new consoles next year and it will be free.Honestly, that's "Stop Playing and Hope they give you a free upgrade to a remaster" land.
That's a terribly false conclusion you've made there based simply on an overall 50% usage of your CPU with your hardware.turns out the game only use around 6 threads max. My ryzen 2600 only have max cpu usage of 50%.
they should target for one of modes high settings without rt, 30fps and resolution above 1440p dynamic, in 1188p is very blurry so I wouldn't play low resolution rt mode (btw one of df video suggests ps5 gpu is on rx5700 not xt performance because of lack of bandwith so they also make mistakes )Obviously, but it wont make it faster then a 3700x which clocks way above 4ghz when needed (besides a larger cache?). Anyway, i compared it to the 3700x which gets a real workout in this title. DF has put the PS5 cpu below a 3700x before, but lets assume due to magic it will match a 3700x, its still a sweat in this game.
Its going to be real intresting what compromises CDPR will make, if they forego ray tracing they can win alot, they can go for high/ultra and maintain 1080p/30 w/o rt, but i doubt it. Maybe 1440p medium and try to reach 60?
no what I said and what you quoted is:
“Without RT and DLSS; PS5 should run the exact same settings at 1440p as 3090 4K.”
The 3090 has very weak rasterization to the point of Nvidia blackmailing reviewers that focus on it.
in anyway, with no RT and DLSS, PS5 will outperform 3090 when PS5 is at 1440 native compared to 3090 4K native.
DLSS produces quite a lot of shimmering and artifacts in this title, but that is besides the point
no not necessarily. It serves another audience. CP2077 may just be another Crysis scenario. A lot of advanced graphic techniques made using methods that are probably inefficient to the type of technologies that will be available going forward. I don't expect CP2077 performance to be considered the norm for going forward. If it is, PS5 and XSX won't even make it after 2022.The biggest scam in the industry atm.