YepnotAFanB said:just to clarufy are we adopting 'shiny shine' as an official term now?
and Sony, Nvidia ATI and other manufacturers should adopt it too.
CG look - The Shiny Shine
- Thread starter chaphack
- Start date
and Sony, Nvidia ATI and other manufacturers should adopt it too.Chris123234:
> Dude...those effects are bad ass.
Nah... they're just ass.
> You obviously have never been in a situation in real life that reflects
> that scene in the demo.
Sure I have. However, in real life, under those lighting conditions, with a roof that reflective, at that proximity, if you look directly into the reflected light you won't just see some ugly white patches, you'd be completely blinded.
> Dude...those effects are bad ass.
Nah... they're just ass.
> You obviously have never been in a situation in real life that reflects
> that scene in the demo.
Sure I have. However, in real life, under those lighting conditions, with a roof that reflective, at that proximity, if you look directly into the reflected light you won't just see some ugly white patches, you'd be completely blinded.
cybamerc said:
what's wrong with asses??
anyway, when r we going to have hardware and especially displays capable of such brightness and contrast that, for example, looking at a switched on lightbulb would blind us just like it happens in real life?
even in TV broadcasts or DVD's, looking directly at the sun just results in a big white light... which can be quite strong sometimes, but not as bright as the real thing, not even close....
question for everyone here ^ ^
cybamerc said:
u know what i mean.... not quite AS blinding, just better than the current "opaque white" used now, especially in games.... like, u know, fire that looks bright like fire and not some yello-orange-white-black thing seen now...
