Water is kinda reflective.
Nonsensical sentence of the decade.
Qroach said:on a side note, why is it that it's so hard to accept that something looks better on xbox compared to a cube vresion, considering all the features xbox box has in hardware. Technically it "should" look better when you have more hardware feature options to use compared to the game cube hardware
Perhaps you've hit on something there? Maybe MS's interchangeable faceplates will allow different company badges on Xenon so the system's always the best?function said:Becuase as we know deep down, the best hardware feature a console can have is the badge of your favourite company.
Becuase as we know deep down, the best hardware feature a console can have is the badge of your favourite company. This feature makes it able to match or outperform any other console, regardless of features or speed, while also ensuring that any features it does lack are ones which aren't needed anyway and actually make games look worse (while at the same time still being possible on your favourite console anway - it's just that people refuse to use them).
This "favourite company badge" feature also makes sure the console gets the best games and the most hardcore games - these games are also often proof of its ability to match or outperform any other console, and that it doesn't need the aforementioned features it lacks (that it can do anyway).
london-boy said:Wow, r u guys still discussing water effects?! My god i thought this was Y2K kind of material....
Dr Evil said:london-boy said:Wow, r u guys still discussing water effects?! My god i thought this was Y2K kind of material....
Eventhough you were also discussing this few hours ago , but you'r right this is pointless, Xbox is numero uno, when we talk about water, just look at the games. I don't understand why it's so hard to say that Xbox can do something better than PS2 or Gamecube, eventhough the difference is like night and day.
we've been through this many times 5 years ago...
london-boy said:Well i only said (and now one commented, although my post was obviously the best ) that most of people's perception for "best looking water" really comes down to how the artist wanted the water to look, not necessarily dependant on the features used to convey the water look. Therefore i'd put this more under "art&design" than on "technicalities". But feel free to stone me to death for saying that.
Dr Evil said:Confidence-Man said:Pariah's got some above-average looking water (at least from screenshots).
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2004/screen0/920045_20040902_screen005.jpg
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2004/screen0/920045_20040902_screen008.jpg
The second picture looks nice with those distortions, and way beoynd than anything on PS2 or Gamecube. We can discuss which console has the best looking games etc., but there is no point talking about water. Best looking water belongs to Xbox.
function said:Becuase as we know deep down, the best hardware feature a console can have is the badge of your favourite company. This feature makes it able to match or outperform any other console, regardless of features or speed, while also ensuring that any features it does lack are ones which aren't needed anyway and actually make games look worse (while at the same time still being possible on your favourite console anway - it's just that people refuse to use them).
This "favourite company badge" feature also makes sure the console gets the best games and the most hardcore games - these games are also often proof of its ability to match or outperform any other console, and that it doesn't need the aforementioned features it lacks (that it can do anyway).
The second picture looks nice with those distortions, and way beoynd than anything on PS2 or Gamecube.