ATI's "Fudo" to have Shader 3.0

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by russo121, Aug 25, 2004.

  1. hstewarth

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    0

    First of all, $150 for non GT version of 6600 seems pretty low end to me.

    If there are changes to 3.0, like 3.0a - unless its done by an extension then it would like would require a new release of Direct X - like Direct X 9.0d. I would also expect that NVidia would make enhancements for NV50 series so they would also have some enhancements.
     
  2. Unit01

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2003
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    hehe a classic :lol: :lol:
    it will bring 60% performance improvement too!!!! :D
     
  3. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,992
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    Location:
    Winfield, IN USA
    Yes, but only on benchmarks. ;)

    Wait a minute, didn't that Inq guy say that ATi ain't gonna never support SM3.0? How can this be true then? :|
     
  4. PatrickL

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,315
    Likes Received:
    13
    Well in fact if they support directly 3.1 they will never support just 3.0 :twisted:

    You know now the Inq's How to make news: Add 2 craps together and post the result.
     
  5. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,992
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    Location:
    Winfield, IN USA
    :lol:

    Ok, but this is all gonna be your fault when it's on the front page of the Inq about SM3.1 tomorrow... ;)
     
  6. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,062
    Likes Received:
    3,119
    Location:
    New York
    No, it's low-end of the midrange :wink:
     
  7. KimB

    Legend

    Joined:
    May 28, 2002
    Messages:
    12,928
    Likes Received:
    230
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Yes, low-end is typically the sub-$100 range.
     
  8. The549

    Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    norcal
    Yeah for me, low end is about $50 for an r8500/gf5200.
     
  9. hstewarth

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    0
    I guess that would be X300 generation type, currently for NVidia its the 5200 series but that that is older generation. I be curious if NVidia's 5200 replacement will support Shader 3.0 stuff.

    My work machine has GF2 MX because graphics needs are not important at work. So for the <$100 range cards is probably not that important to support higher end shaders.
     
  10. Fodder

    Fodder Stealth Nerd
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Sunny Melbourne
    That'd be NV44 in Q4, and I'm pretty sure I've read words from Kirk or Huang to the effect of "SM3.0 from top to bottom".
     
  11. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,517
    Likes Received:
    24,424
    I hope there's more truth to that statement than the GF-4 MX is a DX8 card or the NV30 will be out in time for the holiday season. :wink:
     
  12. Smurfie

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    1
    Didn't XGI come up with a SM3.0 capable part. Could this SM3.1 be for this XGI part?
     
  13. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,992
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    Location:
    Winfield, IN USA
    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    Please forgive me, I find humor in strange places.

    Yeah, I guess that could be a reason for SM3.1.
     
  14. Smurfie

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm stabbing in the dark too. :lol:
     
  15. Unknown Soldier

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,047
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    From what I understood there's gonna be the R480 part before the R520.

    R480 getting released by October/November and the R520 to be released by March/April/May(Spring) 2005.

    The next ATI part is only gonna be a speedbinned R42x.

    At least that's what I understood.

    US
     
  16. jvd

    jvd
    Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Messages:
    12,724
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    new jersey
    same would be with the nv40 . The next part will most likely be a 450mhz part , mabye 475 . The r420 would most likely be around 600-650 mhz .
     
  17. hovz

    Regular

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    920
    Likes Received:
    0
    650??? HIGHLY doubtful. id be suprised if it was even 600.
     
  18. DegustatoR

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,249
    Likes Received:
    3,419
    I wouldn't count on the spring'05 release of R520 guys...
     
  19. max-pain

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    2
  20. RejZoR

    Regular

    Joined:
    May 9, 2004
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Europe\Slovenia\Ljubljana
    Hm very interesting. Lots of question and exclamantion marks,few XGI,NVIDIA and ATI words and thats it. O and i found a 3 smiley animation :lol:
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...