Well you need to be online to share it, otherwise you're just making quick commentary with your friends. Even back in the 300 baud BBS days you were still technically "online"! Hehe...
Well you need to be online to share it, otherwise you're just making quick commentary with your friends. Even back in the 300 baud BBS days you were still technically "online"! Hehe...
with 300 bits/s modem, each bit is encoded in its own symbol.
with more modern kind of modulation like the one used for 56 kbits/s throughput, more than one bit is encoded in a single symbol, so the baudrate is different from the bitrate.
Well you need to be online to share it, otherwise you're just making quick commentary with your friends. Even back in the 300 baud BBS days you were still technically "online"! Hehe...
with 300 bits/s modem, each bit is encoded in its own symbol.
with more modern kind of modulation like the one used for 56 kbits/s throughput, more than one bit is encoded in a single symbol, so the baudrate is different from the bitrate.
You're right, it's not bits but symbols, but considering we travelled up the baud gamut (300, 1200, 2400, 4800, 9600, 14400, 28800...) to where we are now--at which point people started using more precise terminology and culled the labelling--it means effectively the same thing to people who... you know... actually know what "baud" was.
We still have enough grief over the technical and marketing names of megabytes and kilobytes, so there's always some sway in these lands. I wasn't talking about it literally (hence the tonguey) but... you know... in that "spiritual" way you can sorta get from age-old computer use.
Considering everything is even MORE transparent, with people either having "modems" or "broadband"--with almost NO inkling of their functional data rates--THAT part is more confusing than ever before. And less important, to boot.