And last but not least... MS financials

It's not about being online. I remember people ranting about which computer was better Amiga, PC, ST, and before that, C64, Spectrum, BBC

People rant about everything...
 
Well you need to be online to share it, otherwise you're just making quick commentary with your friends. ;) Even back in the 300 baud BBS days you were still technically "online"! Hehe...

Man, 300 baud... That brings back some memories. o_O
 
cthellis42 said:
Well you need to be online to share it, otherwise you're just making quick commentary with your friends. ;) Even back in the 300 baud BBS days you were still technically "online"! Hehe...

Man, 300 baud... That brings back some memories. o_O

Mate, the term Baud brings back memories... :devilish:
 
a baud = a symbol != a bit

with 300 bits/s modem, each bit is encoded in its own symbol.
with more modern kind of modulation like the one used for 56 kbits/s throughput, more than one bit is encoded in a single symbol, so the baudrate is different from the bitrate.
 
cthellis42 said:
Well you need to be online to share it, otherwise you're just making quick commentary with your friends. ;) Even back in the 300 baud BBS days you were still technically "online"! Hehe...

Man, 300 baud... That brings back some memories. o_O

Yup, you could spell-check text during transfer! :)
 
Magnum PI said:
a baud = a symbol != a bit

with 300 bits/s modem, each bit is encoded in its own symbol.
with more modern kind of modulation like the one used for 56 kbits/s throughput, more than one bit is encoded in a single symbol, so the baudrate is different from the bitrate.
You're right, it's not bits but symbols, but considering we travelled up the baud gamut (300, 1200, 2400, 4800, 9600, 14400, 28800...) to where we are now--at which point people started using more precise terminology and culled the labelling--it means effectively the same thing to people who... you know... actually know what "baud" was. ;)

We still have enough grief over the technical and marketing names of megabytes and kilobytes, so there's always some sway in these lands. I wasn't talking about it literally (hence the tonguey) but... you know... in that "spiritual" way you can sorta get from age-old computer use. ;)
 
We still climbed the "baud" terminology all the way up to the 57,600 (or perhaps more like 28,800) at which point the terminology become passé, people only referred to Kbps, and everything became staple. The underlying tech has almost always been transparent anyway, and the understanding not really necessary. We knew the marketing terms.

Considering everything is even MORE transparent, with people either having "modems" or "broadband"--with almost NO inkling of their functional data rates--THAT part is more confusing than ever before. And less important, to boot.
 
Back
Top