Jawed
Legend
I'm so out of touch. DP FLOPs/mm² off the charts.So Hawaii originally has a 2:1 DP ratio, but the consumer versions were cut down to 8:1?
Is anyone using them?
I'm so out of touch. DP FLOPs/mm² off the charts.So Hawaii originally has a 2:1 DP ratio, but the consumer versions were cut down to 8:1?
There are some inaccuracies in the Anandtech article. "GCN 1.1" or whatever is their naming, so it doesn't really mean anything in the first place.
Does that mean that Tonga is based on a different IP level?
That's for interfacing with AMD's S400 Genlock/Framelock module.
That's for interfacing with AMD's S400 Genlock/Framelock module.
A block diagram on AMD Tonga R9 285 has appeared on the web, and it shows that the GPU carries 2048 Stream Processors. Tonga will end up as the GPU used in the AMD Radeon R9 285, however already is used in yesterday's release FirePro cards.
The GPU has 2048 GCN stream processors running over 32 compute units. The chip would have 128 texture memory units
The block diagram originates from a FirePro W7100 professional graphics card presentation which is based on "Tonga." The W7100 uses 28 of the 32 available CUs and as such you can easily recalculate the true number of shader processors. Tonga will be tied to a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface
The initial consumer graphics card based on Tonga will be the Radeon R9 285 which is expect to have 1792 activated stream processors making it perform at GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon HD 7950 level performance but with better thermals and lower power consumption.
How reliable is that? I see no reason to trust that. Looks more like a photoshop of a Hawaii block diagram.
I suspect it is just because the similar SP count between the 7950 and the 285 ( If specs are true ofc ). If clocked higher + little arch imporvement at standard 1080p resolution the new 285 should be faster ( first 7950 = 850mhz, 7950 Boost = 925mhz ) @ 1050mhz, this could be just under the 7970GHZ perf.Hmm 285 slower than the 280? Either false or a stupid move.