Ability to pair up different size monitors is awesome.
Ability to pair up different size monitors is awesome.
Going by the yellow triangle on the leftmost image it seems like the monitors have equal resolution, just different physical screen size.
Of course it could just be a photoshopping error
If it's faster than GTX 580 it will cost the same or more than GTX 580. We dont have to like it but that's the way it will be.
4870 was almost as fast as GTX 280
That's not always the case. 4870 was almost as fast as GTX 280 when it was released, but the price points were drastically different: 299$ vs 650$.
NV cut nearly half of GT200 price after R700 release,then they probably priced thereabouts.I suppose, but it was similar in performance to GTX 260 and thus probably priced thereabouts (I dont remember exact pricing at those times). .
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1587125&postcount=805
Hopefully a 128-Bit Cape Verde Pro and XT is 192-Bit. Or could be 128-Bit@5,5Gbps enough to feed a ~150mm² GCN 28nm die?
Considering pad-limits for GDDR5, would be even 5Gbps GDDR5 possible @125mm²?
Since Cape Verde might have only a single-setup, it probably scale it execution-units by 2.
My guess:
10 SIMDs (640SPs/40 TMUs) @1GHz + 128-Bit@4,4Gbps. Performance especially in D3D11 a bit over HD 5770/6770, many new features and a price around $100.
I also thought it would be 10CU,but....My guess:
10 SIMDs (640SPs/40 TMUs) @1GHz + 128-Bit@4,4Gbps. Performance especially in D3D11 a bit over HD 5770/6770, many new features and a price around $100.
I think CU count has to be a multiple of 4, so 10CU isn't possible—unless GCN is a bit more flexible than we were led to believe.
In D3D11 games it probably will be.It's extremely unlikely that HD7700 would lose to HD5700/6700 in anything, so I'd say it has to be around 6800-level to be safe.
I know. But do you think Cape Verde will be "dual-core"/double-setup-engine?I also thought it would be 10CU,but....
So,it more likely will have 12CU.....performance around 6850 probaly...
The memory controller itself is a big chunk of logic also, so I guess this one will use the cheaper implementation for low clock-rates. And we still don't know how well padding elements scale with the 28 nm process.Considering pad-limits for GDDR5, would be even 5Gbps GDDR5 possible @125mm²?
Yes, but wasn't it also mentioned that they're supposed to be "OEM only" products?Do not forget, that Turks (480SPs VLIW5, 128-Bit) will go for HD 7600/HD 7500 series with no additional features.