It depends on what you compare. For DP-FLOPs/Watt or DP-FLOPs/mm² it would be a gain, not a hit.Does going 1:2 vs 1:4 incur a (heavy) hit on perf/W and perf/mm2?
No, and you should get rid of this idea to desperately foist this ridiculous os.As a gamer, will you be updating to Windows 8 anytime soon?
There may be no reference model from AMD, but you can actually buy different models from Powercolor (2 variants, the "normal" one and the Devil13) and Club3D with VTX having announced a fourth one (but it hasn't arrived in shops so far). Right now, you have to pay between 816€ for the cheapest version and 920€ or so for the Devil13 (including 19% VAT) here in Germany. And there are cards in stock, they are existing and buyable.AMD already showed a dual-tahiti card card long ago, in a firepro presentation, and the 7990 never surfaced, so go figure... http://techreport.com/news/23114/amd-shows-upcoming-dual-gpu-card
No, and you should get rid of this idea to desperately foist this ridiculous os.As a gamer, will you be updating to Windows 8 anytime soon?
Oh, and if you don't fix your os and with next versions continue in the same manner, then I will switch to Linux or MacOS or whatever... Just not this.
Well, that's discouraging. Vista is what kicked me into the Mac camp. My PC still hasn't been upgraded to Win7 and I still hate Vista first hand.I'm a gamer, I updated to Win8, and after just couple days I can already say that Win8 is having the same problem Vista had - a lot of bad talk based on hearsay and 3rd or 4th hand information.
Well, that's discouraging. Vista is what kicked me into the Mac camp. My PC still hasn't been upgraded to Win7 and I still hate Vista first hand.
Turn off auto-indexing. My biggest problem with Vista was that graphics performance was generally lower than XP. Win7 addressed most of these issues.The biggest issue I had with Vista was that the hard drive seemed to be accessing constantly, even when the PC was supposed to be idling.
Turn off auto-indexing. My biggest problem with Vista was that graphics performance was generally lower than XP. Win7 addressed most of these issues.
Both.But was that down to OS, or just immature drivers on the new driver model?
Very bad performance for simple file system tasks, especially if they involved network accesses (it was often only 10% of the performance with XP). One could even crash the Windows Explorer with certain file copy tasks. The performance got somewhat improved with SP1, though (and the crashes were gone). But it was still tangible slower for accessing Windows network drives than XP at that time.Aside from 3rd party driver issues, what was wrong with Vista when you tried it?
This. The disk swapping. Never. Stopped. I don't care what the reason was. Add to that the inane security naggings. The unusable backup system (for the cheapest Vista version at least). I'm sure it was possible to fix all that, but I simply decided it was time to give up and spend a bit more for something less insulting that works out of the box. (The introduction of TimeMachine was the final push.) I did install a $20 (corporate discount) WinXP virtual machine on my Mac which was more bearable than Vista.The biggest issue I had with Vista was that the hard drive seemed to be accessing constantly, even when the PC was supposed to be idling.
From ComputerWorld: "Nvidia, AMD release graphics processors for supercomputing."
FirePro SM10000: 1.48 DP TFLOPS, 6 GB memory.