Performance @ very high resolutions just doesn't seem scale beyond the relative increase in mem frequency - so the Black Edition's ~ 8,1 percent increase in GPU clock appear thwarted by the very mild ~ 3,6 percent increase in mem clock.Interesting that Black Edition of HD7970 did not do well over vanilla HD7970 (1920 resolution was really good ~7 FPS - but.compare to 2560 resolution only 2.5 FPS difference)
Anyone eelse who has a feeling that 7970 was paper launched?
Already sold out?!
But I do have to wonder if AMD caught themselves in another Cypress situation where they didn't book enough wafers.
There's just no way to tell. Stock could be decent to good but demand only has to be a little more than stock for the product to sell out. Then again it could be that available stock was low.
So depending on whether you're pessimistic or optimistic I guess is what you're going to think the case is. Unlike some previous launches from AMD/Nvidia we're not hearing many reports on whether initial stock levels were above or below average.
Who knows it could play out like 5870 where it was constantly going in and out of stock for months. Although at that price point, I can't imagine the high initial demand is going to last for months on end.
The absurdly high overclock headroom available on most chips also seems to suggest that yields are quite good which explains why 7950 isn't going to launch until sales for 7970 start to die down. Why sell the exact same chip for less when you can get full price during launch with no need to artificially castrate a chip just so you have stock of a lower tier card to generate more demand and get more sales.
We'll have a better idea of how things are playing out in another week or two when initial launch demand starts to die down. But I do have to wonder if AMD caught themselves in another Cypress situation where they didn't book enough wafers. This time not due to underestimating demand for the chip but instead thinking another foundry would be ready to start producing chips.
Regards,
SB
Depends on where you look, OCUK for example has 6 different brands with "10+" in stock (10+ is the highest number they use)
Anyone eelse who has a feeling that 7970 was paper launched?
Already sold out?!
That's not really paper imho. But they are pretty expensive considered the $500 (gtx580) vs $550 MSRP...
I would just say yield != bin splits.The absurdly high overclock headroom available on most chips also seems to suggest that yields are quite good which explains why 7950 isn't going to launch until sales for 7970 start to die down. Why sell the exact same chip for less when you can get full price during launch with no need to artificially castrate a chip just so you have stock of a lower tier card to generate more demand and get more sales.
Anyone eelse who has a feeling that 7970 was paper launched?
Already sold out?!
Should I post my UPS tracking number?Anyone eelse who has a feeling that 7970 was paper launched?
Already sold out?!
Look like I've found the dimensions of the cards through Anandtech. I'm still trying to find out why Asus charging more though.
Look like I've found the dimensions of the cards through Anandtech. I'm still trying to find out why Asus charging more though.
Because it's ASUS.
But the dimensions simply have to be wrong, according to him all the cards have different dimensions (except for the 2 XFX-cards), while they all use same cooler (except the XFX ones) and should use same PCB
That's why I asked if these cards are using the same PCB layout and components. We really need a review showing PCB layout between different AIB's.Wonder why the lengths varied so much. With the exception of the XFX dual fan one, all seem to have the same HSF setup. The way of measuring can't explain the difference of over an inch.